SAFA FAO as an assessment tool for family farming under the sustainability bias

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v14n1.2023.47089

Palabras clave:

sustainability analysis, environmental indicators, watershed committees, rural livelihoods

Resumen

The use of Rapid Assessment Protocols can characterise environmental problems such as the degradation of river sources, help understand the socio-environmental scenario of rural communities, and contribute to a more in-depth characterisation of the context and the elaboration of public policies for its solution. This work aims to evaluate the sustainability index (SI) of rural properties using the SAFA tool. Indicators were selected that can contribute to identifying the advantages and limitations of rural properties inserted in a stream micro-basin in Brazil (Barra Grande, Canoinhas, Santa Catarina State). The community generally has a good SI, mainly due to economic resilience and social well- being dimensions, with lowest scores in environmental integrity and good governance. On the other hand, themes that should receive attention to increase the SI of the families are related to the increase of biodiversity in the properties, with an emphasis on forest coverage.

Biografía del autor/a

  • Juliano de Oliveira, Masters in Environmental Science, Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina (Epagri), Canoinhas, SC, Brazil

    Agronomist by Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (2000) and Chemist by same University (2002). He is currently an agronomist at the Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina (EPAGRI) of Canoinhas - SC, where he meets the requests of local family farming and is responsible for the Grains and Environmentally Sustainable Development program of EPAGRI in the North Plateau of Santa Catarina. He has experience in cereal production, with emphasis on seed production and processing, for 8 years was the technical manager of the seed processing unit (UBS) at Cooperalfa. He has a Postgraduate Degree in Sustainable Rural Development (2017) by Instituto Federal de Santa Catarina (IFSC). Masters in Environmental Sciences (2022) by the Instituto Federal Catarinense (IFC).

  • Ana Lúcia Hanisch, Doctor in Plant Production, Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina (Epagri), Canoinhas, SC, Brazil

    Doctor in Plant Production by Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) (2018), Master in Animal Science by Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) (2002) and Agronomist by UFPR (1994). She is has been researcher at EPAGRI - Agricultural Research and Rural Extension Company of Santa Catarina since 2004, developing works with pastures areas and integrated agricultural production systems (SSP and SAFs in caivas), also works in research with industrial residues with potential use in the farming.

  • Daniel da Rosa Farias, Doctor in Agronomy, Professor, Instituto Federal Catarinense, Araquari, SC, Brazil

    Professor at Federal Institute of Santa Catarina (IFC), Plant Production. Agronomist by Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel). In 2008, he entered the master's course of Plant Breeding in the Graduate Program in Agronomy (PPGA) at UFPel, in 2009 he progressed to doctoral level and in 2010 he obtained the title of Master in Science (PPGA/FAEM/ UFPel). In 2010/2011 he completed a sandwich doctorate at the Universté de Perpignan Via Domitia (France), and in 2013 he completed his doctorate. From 2013 to 2016 he worked as a Postdoctoral fellow at the Genomics Center and Plant Breeding (FAEM/UFPel) where he carried out both teaching and research activities. During this period, he carried out genomics and transcriptomes analysis aimed genetic improvement of cereals. He has experience in Agronomy, with emphasis on Plant Breeding and Bioinformatics. He was coordinator (from 2020 to 2022) of the Graduate Program in Technology and Environment (PGTA) at IFC, and he is currently the assistant coordinator of the course.

Referencias

ALI, Y. et al. Comparative occupational health risk between tobacco and paddy farming people in Bangladesh. SSM – Mental Health, v. 2, p. 100061, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmmh.2022.100061.

ALVAREZ, S. et al. Participatory impact pathways analysis: a practical method for project planning and evaluation. Development in Practice, v. 20, n. 8, p. 946-958, 2010. DOI: 10.1080/09614524.2010.513723.

BENEDICTO, S. C. et al. Sustentabilidade: um fenômeno multifacetário que requer um diálogo interdisciplinar. Sustentabilidade: diálogos interdisciplinares, v. 1, p. 1-24, 2020. DOI: 10.24220/2675-7885v1e2020a5168.

BRIQUEL, V. et al. La méthode IDEA (indicateurs de durabilité des exploitations agricoles): une démarche pédagogique. Ingénieries eau-agriculture-territoires, n. 25, p. 29- 39, 2001.

BRUM, A. L. et al. Tobacco production chain in Southern Brazil: study of the composition and relationship of its agents. Research, Society and Development, v. 9, n. 9, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i9.7769.

CAMMARATA, M.; TIMPANARO, G.; SCUDERI, A. Assessing sustainability of organic livestock farming in Sicily: a case study using the Fao Safa framework. Agriculture, v. 11, n. 3, p. 274, 2021. DOI: 10.3390/agriculture11030274.

COLOMBO, T. C.; WATANABE, M. Analysis of Sustainability Indicators in Irrigated Rice Production in the South of Santa Catarina, Brazil. In: International Business, Trade and Institutional Sustainability. Springer, Cham, 2020. p. 403-413. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-26759-9_23.

CRUZ, N. B. et al. Acesso da agricultura familiar ao crédito e à assistência técnica no Brasil. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, v. 59, n. 3, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9479.2021.226850.

DESA, U. N. et al. Transforming Our World: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. 2016.

ELOY, L. R. et al. Sustentabilidade de propriedades rurais participantes do Projeto de Produção Integrada em Sistemas Agropecuários: utilização da ferramenta SAFA/FAO. Available in: https://biblioguias.cepal.org/bigpushparaasustentabilidade. Access in: Aug. 25, 2022.

FAO – FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANISATION. Sustainability assessment of food and agriculture systems. In: SAFA, Guidelines, Version 3.0. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2014.

FAO – FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANISATION. Sustainability Assessment of Food and Agriculture systems (SAFA). Available in: https://www.fao.org/nr/sustainability/sustainability-assessments-safa/en/. Access in: Jan. 12, 2022.

GABA, S. et al. Ecology for sustainable and multifunctional agriculture. In: Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 28. Springer, Cham, 2018. p. 1-46. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-90309-5_1.

GAYATRI, S. et al. Assessing sustainability of smallholder beef cattle farming in Indonesia: a case study using the FAO SAFA framework. Journal of Sustainable Development, v. 9, n. 3, p. 1755-1315, 2016. DOI: 10.5539/jsd.v9n3p236.

HANISCH, A. L. et al. Evaluating sustainability in traditional silvopastoral systems (caívas): looking beyond the impact of animals on biodiversity. Sustainability, v. 11, n. 11, p. 3098, 2019. DOI: doi.org/10.3390/su11113098.

HUTTUNEN, S. et al. What about citizens? A literature review of citizen engagement in sustainability transitions research. Energy Research & Social Science, v. 91, p. 102714, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2022.102714.

LARSEN, B. A.; KRISTENSEN, M. J.; CONFALONE, A. E. Implementation of agroecological indicators for environmental diagnosis in a livestock productive facility from the southeast of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science, v. 54, n. 3, 2020.

LOCH, C. et al. Multifuncionalidade da paisagem como subsídio às políticas públicas para o desenvolvimento rural sustentável. Ciência Rural, v. 45, p. 171-177, 2015. DOI: 10.1590/0103-8478cr20131087.

LÓPEZ-RIDAURA, S.; MASERA, O.; ASTIER, M. The MESMIS framework. Leisa, v. 16, p. 28-30, 2000.

MACH, K. J. et al. Actionable knowledge and the art of engagement. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, v. 42, p. 30-37, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2020.01.002.

MENICUCCI, T.; D’ALBUQUERQUE, R. Política de saneamento vis-à-vis à política de saúde: encontros, desencontros e seus efeitos. Saneamento como política pública: um olhar a partir dos desafios do SUS, p. 9-52, 2018.

OLDE, E. M. D. et al. Assessing sustainability at farm-level: lessons learned from a comparison of tools in practice. Ecological Indicators, v. 66, p. 391-404, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.01.047.

PALMER, C. G. et al. Engaging society and building participatory governance in a rural landscape restoration context. Anthropocene, v. 37, p. 100320, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.ancene.2022.100320.

POTRICH, R.; GRZYBOVSKI, D.; TOEBE, C. S. Sustentabilidade nas pequenas propriedades rurais: um estudo exploratório sobre a percepção do agricultor. Estudos Sociedade e Agricultura, v. 25, n. 1, p. 208-228, 2017.

SOLDI, A. Sustainability assessment of agricultural systems in Paraguay: a comparative study using FAO's SAFA framework. Sustainability, v. 11, n. 13, p. 3745, 2019. DOI: doi.org/10.3390/su11133745.

TORESAN, L. et al. Indicadores de desempenho da agropecuária e do agronegócio de Santa Catarina: 2018 e 2019. Boletim Técnico, n. 191, 2019.

VIGLIZZO, E. F. et al. A rapid method for assessing the environmental performance of commercial farms in the Pampas of Argentina. Environmental monitoring and assessment, v. 117, p. 109-134, 2006. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-006-7981-y.

Descargas

Publicado

2023-04-30

Número

Vol. 14 Núm. 1 (2023): Sustainability in Debate / Sustentabilidade em Debate

Sección

Articles - Varia

Licencia

Derechos de autor 2023 Sustainability in Debate

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.

La presentación de la(s) obra(s) científica(s) original(es) por parte de los autores, como titulares de los derechos de autor de los textos enviados a la revista, de conformidad con la Ley 9.610/98, implica la cesión de derechos de autor de publicaciones impresas y/o digitales a la Revista de Sustenibilidad en Debate de los artículos aprobados para fines de publicación, en un único número de la Revista, autorizando también que la(s) obra(s) científica(s) aprobada(s) se divulguen de forma gratuita, sin ningún tipo de reembolso de derechos de autor, a través del sitio web de a Revista, para leer, imprimir y/o descargar el archivo de texto, a partir de la fecha de aceptación para publicación. Por lo tanto, los autores, al presentar los artículos a la Revista y, en consecuencia, la libre cesión de derechos de autor relacionados con el trabajo científico presentado, son plenamente conscientes de que no serán remunerados por la publicación de los artículos en la revista. 

La Revista está licenciada bajo una licencia no comercial y sin derivaciones Creative Commons (No permite la realización de obras derivadas) 3.0 Brasil, con el propósito de difundir conocimientos científicos, como se indica en el sitio web de la publicación, que permite el intercambio del texto y el reconocimiento de su autoría y publicación original en esta revista.

Los autores pueden asumir contratos adicionales por separado, para la distribución no exclusiva de las obras publicadas en la revista Sustenibilidad en Debate (por ejemplo, en un capítulo de libro), siempre que se indique que los textos se publicaron originalmente en esta revista y que se menciona el DOI correspondiente. Se permite y incentiva a los autores a publicar y distribuir su texto online después de su publicación (por ejemplo, en repositorios institucionales o en sus páginas personales). 

Los autores aceptan expresamente los términos de esta Declaración de Derechos de Autor, que se aplicará a la presentación si es publicada por esta Revista.

Cómo citar

SAFA FAO as an assessment tool for family farming under the sustainability bias. (2023). Sustainability in Debate, 14(1), 216-229. https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v14n1.2023.47089

Artículos similares

1-10 de 175

También puede Iniciar una búsqueda de similitud avanzada para este artículo.