A new approach to the ethics of AI based on the concept of subjective rate of time in speed superintelligence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26512/rfmc.v13i2.55074Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence. Superintelligence. Phenomenology of Time. Ethics.Abstract
This paper provides a new approach to the Philosophy of AI based on the concept of subjective rate of time, introduced by Nick Bostrom and Eliezer Yudkowsky in the paper The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence (2014). Considered an exotic property possessed by an artificial mind (AI) that operates much faster than the human mind, it relates to the speed of information processing: the faster a mind operates, the slower it perceives the external world. This novel concept raises a host of ethical questions, grounded in the assumption that a fast AI possesses sentience – the capacity for phenomenal experience, including the ability to feel pain and suffer. In this case, one objective year of suffering for a human being can correspond to a thousand subjective years of suffering for an artificial mind if it processes information one thousand times faster than a biological brain.
References
ARSTILA, V.; LLOYD, D. (eds.). Subjective time: the philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of temporality. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2014.
BOSTROM, N. Superintelligence: paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
BOSTROM, N.; YUDKOWSKY, E. The ethics of artificial intelligence. In: FRANKISH, K.; RAMSEY, W. M. (eds.). The Cambridge handbook of artificial intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
BRENTANO, F. Psychology from an empirical standpoint. Transl. A. C. Rancurello; D. B. Terrell; L. McAlister. London: Routledge, 1973.
BRINGSJORD, S.; GOVINDARAJULU, N. S. Artificial intelligence. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Disponível em: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/artificial-intelligence/. Acesso em: 19 nov. 2025.
HUSSERL, E. Logical investigations. Transl. J. N. Findlay. London: Routledge, 1973.
KURZWEIL, R. The age of spiritual machines: when computers exceed human intelligence. New York, NY: Penguin USA, 2000.
KURZWEIL, R. The singularity is near: when humans transcend biology. New York, NY: Penguin USA, 2006.
PROUDFOOT, D. Software immortals: science or faith? In: EDEN, A.; MOOR, J.; SORAKER, J.; STEINHART, E. (eds.). Singularity hypotheses: a scientific and philosophical assessment. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2012.
RUSSELL, S. J.; NORVIG, P. Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. Malaysia: Pearson Education Limited, 2016.
SANDBERG, A. The physics of information processing superobjects: daily life among the Jupiter brains. Journal of Evolution and Technology, v. 5, n. 1, 1999.
WEARDEN, J.; O’DONOGHUE, A.; OGDEN, R.; MONTGOMERY, C. Subjective duration in the laboratory and the world outside. In: ARSTILA, V.; LLOYD, D. (eds.). Subjective time: the philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of temporality. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2014.
YAMPOLSKIY, R.; FOX, J. Artificial intelligence and the human mental model. In: EDEN, A.; MOOR, J.; SORAKER, J.; STEINHART, E. (eds.). Singularity hypotheses: a scientific and philosophical assessment. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2012.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Modern and Contemporary Philosophy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings.
