Information literacy in scientific communication: the experience of PROPETIPS – UNESP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26512/rici.v18.n1.2025.56617Keywords:
Information literacy, Research ethics, Scientific communicationAbstract
Created in 2017, by the Vice-Presidency of Research at Unesp, the Propetips series emerges as a pioneering initiative aimed at disseminating information about scientific communication strategies. Aimed at researchers, both teachers and students, these directives provide quick and timely information on scientific communication strategies and aim to increase the visibility of scientific production and raise the academic prestige of the institution. Thus, the objectives are to describe and analyze the experience of information literacy in scientific communication promoted by this series, highlighting its implementation in public and open access spaces. The relevance of this study lies in the growing need for effective strategies that promote the ability to locate, evaluate and use scientific information efficiently, especially in an academic scenario increasingly saturated with information. In methodological terms, a qualitative approach is adopted, focusing on the content analysis of the 42 Propetips made available until 2024. The analysis is structured around the thematic categorization of Propetips classified into a) structural aspects of scientific production and communication; b) ethical aspects; c) strategic aspects; d) visibility and scientific metrics; e) research funding; and f) academic praxis. This is combined with investigation into the presence and prominence of these Propetips on the websites of libraries and postgraduate programs at Unesp and other institutions, to evaluate the capillarity of this initiative and verify its integration into the practices and informational resources offered to researchers. by these academic and library service units. The results point to the effectiveness of Propetips as a training mechanism in scientific communication, emphasizing the importance of its didactic and accessible approach, especially for young researchers and new teachers. The highly significant return that the Propetips publicity had among the 353 new teachers from different areas of knowledge hired by the university in 2023 stands out, attesting to the pertinence, relevance and usefulness of the Propetips contents presented in a simple, didactic and enlightening way, important elements for those who enter an academic career and have scientific practice in their daily lives. It is concluded that Propetips are an important institutional initiative of information literacy in scientific production and communication that provides a culture of knowledge socialization in which the subjects of the process are motivated to disseminate and share these strategic contents with fellow teachers and students, which generates a chain action of high potential.
References
CASTILLO-MARTÍNEZ, I. M.; REGALADO, C. P. C.; GLASSERMAN-MORALES, L. D.; RAMÍREZ-MONTOYA, M. S. Academic literacy among the university students in Mexico and Spain: a holistic perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 13, 1055954, 2023.
CRANE, D. Invisible colleges: diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1972.
CUMMING, A. Multiple dimensions of academic language and literacy development. Language Learning, v. 63, n.s1, p. 130–152, 2013.
FUNDAÇÃO DE AMPARO À PESQUISA DO ESTADO DE SÃO PAULO (FAPESP). Código de boas práticas científicas. São Paulo: Fapesp, 2014.
GONZÁLEZ-SOLAR, L. La biblioteca universitaria orientada a la investigación: propuesta de um modelo de servicio centrado en el usuario desde la perspectiva del marketing. 2016. Tese (Doctorado em Sociedad del Conocimiento: Nuevas perspectivas en Documentación, Comunicación y Humanidades). Coruña: Universidad da Coruña, 2016.
HAAS, P. M. 1992. Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, v. 46, n. 1, p. 1-35, 1992.
HJØRLAND, B. Reviews of concepts in knowledge organization. Knowledge Organization: v. 44, n. 6, p. 436-464, 2017.
KOLTAY, T.; ŠPIRANEC, S.; KARVALICS, L. S. Research 2.0 and the future of information literacy. Cambridge: Chandos, 2016.
MARINKOVICH, J.; VELÁSQUEZ, M.; CÓRDOVA, A.; CID, C. Academic literacy and genres in university learning communities. Ilha do Desterro, v. 69, n. 3, p. 95-113, 2016.
MARZAL, M. A. A taxonomic proposal for multiliteracies and their competencies. Profesional de la Información, v. 29, n. 4, e290435, 2020.
PRÓ-REITORIA DE PESQUISA (PROPe/Unesp). Propetips. 2024. Disponível em: https://www2.unesp.br/portal#!/prope/apoio-ao-pesquisador/propetips/ Acesso em 14 mar. 2024.
SILVA, E. G. O escritório de comunicação científica como perspectiva de atuação para bibliotecas universitárias brasileiras. Tese (Doutorado em Ciência da Informação). Marília: Unesp, 2023.
SWALES, J. The concept of discourse community. In: SWALES, J. Genre analysis: english in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. p. 21-32.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Maria Cristina Piumbato Innocentini Hayashi, Laura Maria Rego-Piva

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, allowing the sharing of work and recognition of the work of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to take on additional contracts separately, non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this journal (ex.: distribute to an institutional repository or publish as a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to distribute their work online (eg.: in institutional repositories or on their website) at any point before or during the editorial process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and citation the published work.













