Linhas gerais para construção de um modelo de avaliação de impacto da inovação aplicável a organizações de pesquisa agropecuária

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v13n3.2022.43702

Palavras-chave:

Pesquisa Agropecuária, Avaliação de Impacto, Inovação, Sustentabilidade

Resumo

Este artigo está focado em um modelo conceitual de avaliação de impacto, especialmente direcionado a organizações de pesquisa agropecuária. Baseado em revisão de literatura, suas contribuições inovadoras são: I. linhas teóricas para a construção de um modelo de avaliação de impacto como base para um futuro sistema de gestão; II. uma base conceitual para avaliação de impacto de inovação que leva em conta uma perspectiva transversal de sustentabilidade, integrando as dimensões ambiental, social, política e econômica. O artigo apresenta um modelo teórico aplicável a organizações de pesquisa e inovação em sintonia com os Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável das Nações Unidas, bem como buscando uma lógica sistêmica que atenda aos desafios e demandas das partes interessadas da instituição de pesquisa.

 

Biografia do Autor

  • Sávio Barros de Mendonça, PhD in Innovation Impact Assessment, Analyst of Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation – Embrapa, Brasília, Brazil

    PhD on Impact Assessment of Innovation, by a sustainability perspective, University of Montpellier, France (2019). Master on Sustainable Development at University of Brasilia (2000). Specialization on Planing and Assessment for Environment at University of Aberdeen, Scotland (1997). Business Administration at Federal University of Amazonas (1983). Official at Embrapa (since 1990). Has been experience on public management and policies for environment and for sustainable agricultural production, as well as for sustainable development. He was Director of Production Systems and Sustainability at the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Supply (2008-2011); Member of the UNEP-FAO Agrifood-System / Sustainable Consumption and Production Task Force (2010-2014); Secretary of Water Resources of Government of the State of Amazonas (2004-2007); Adviser for Cooperation and Institutional Relations of Government of the State of Amazonas (2003-2004, 2007-2008); General-Coordinator for Environmental Policy Assessment; General-Coordinator for Biodiversity and for Environmental Education, Focal Point and Representative of the Brazilian Government (Ministry of the Environment) at the Conferences of the Parties of the UN to Combat Desertification (1997-1999), and member of the Board of the National Environment Fund , from the Ministry of the Environment (1996-1997).

  • Anne-Elisabeth Laques, PhD in Geography, Researcher of Institut de Recherche pour le Développement - IRD, Montpellier, France

    Graduated in Geography - Université de Pau (1985), master's degree in geography - Université de Toulouse le Mirail / CNES (1986), PhD in Geographie Amenagement - Universite de Toulouse le Mirail /Universidad de Los Andes - Venezuela (1993), professor of geography - Université d'Avignon (2009). She is currently a permanent employee at the Institut de Recherche pour le Développement. She is specialized in landscape analysis, and uses satellite images indifferent scales to define indicators of the landscape, and markers of socio-environmental dynamics. In Brazil,  she coordinated a multidisciplinary knowledge-sharing project to help control the effects of space events on human health (dam, urbanization, deforestation, health policies, etc.). Currently, her research focuses on landscape indicators capable ofassessing the impact of policies public in the field of environmental protection. She is a Senior Researcher on the board of the IRD – Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, France, and is linked to the UMR ESPACE-DEV. She is also coordinator of the Center for Scientific Competencies on Landscape CES/Centre d’Expertise Scientifique: "Paysage".

Referências

ALSTON, J. M.; NORTON, G. W.; PARDY, P. G. Science Under Scarcity: principles and practices for agricultural research evaluation and priority setting. Cornell University Press and ISNAR, Ithaca, 1995.

ASIF, M. et al. An integrated management systems approach to corporate sustainability. European Business Review, v. 23, n. 4, p. 353 – 367, 2011.

AVILA, A. F. D.; RODRIGUES, G. S.; VEDOVOTO, G. L. Avaliação dos impactos de tecnologias geradas pela Embrapa: metodologia de referência. Embrapa Informação Tecnológica. ISBN 978-85-7383-420-8, 2008. Available at: https://www.embrapa.br/busca-de-publicacoes/-/publicacao/15196/avaliacao-dos-impactos-de-tecnologias- geradas-pela-embrapa-metodologia-de-referencia, accessed 02/08/2018.

BANTILAN, C.; TEMPLETON, D.; CRASWELL, E. Concepts and Tools for Agricultural Research Evaluation and Impact Assessment – Report on Master Class on Impact Assessment International. Edited by Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, PATANCHERU, A. P., India, 2014. Available at: https://www.crawfordfund.org/ wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Impact_assesment_Masterclass.pdf.

BARBIERI, J. C. et al. Innovation and Sustainability: new models and propositions. RAE São Paulo, v. 50, n. 2, p. 146-154. ISSN 0034-7590, 2010. Available at: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rae/v50n2/02.

BARRET, D. et al. Impress Ex-Ante: une proposition de démarche pour construire ex ante les chemins de l’impact. CIRAD, 2018. Available at: https://agritrop.cirad.fr/587110/1/ID587110.pdf.

BARROS DE MENDONÇA, S.; LAQUES, A-E. Sustainability Impact Assessment: an overview with a holistic and transdisciplinary perspective towards agricultural research. Edited by Environmental Management and Sustainable Development Journal – Macrothink Institute. ISSN 2164-7682 2017, v. 6, n. 2., 2017. Available at: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/emsd/article/view/11333/9169.

BERTALANFFY, L. von. General System Theory: foundations, development, Applications. New York: George Braziller, 1968.

BROOK, J. W.; PAGNANELLI, F. Integrating sustainability into innovation project portfolio management. A strategic perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management – JET-M, 2014, v. 34, p. 46-62. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2013.11.004.

BUCKLEY, W. A sociologia e a moderna teoria dos sistemas. Trad. O. Cajado, 2. ed., São Paulo, Cultrix, p. 9-68, 1976. CATO, M. S. Green Economics. Earthscan, p. 36–37. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3, London, 2009.

CHESBROUGH, H. W.; WEST, J.; VANHAVERBEKE, W. Open Innovation: researching a new paradigm. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2006.

CHRISTENSEN, C. M.; RAYNOR, M. E.; MCDONALD, R. What is disruptive innovation? Harvard Business Review, December, 2015. Available at: https://hbr.org/2015/12/what-is-disruptive-innovation.

CRAIG, D. The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures – a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, v. 15, n. 3, p. 282-311, 2002.

DIEZ, M. A. The Evaluation of Regional Innovation and Cluster Policies: towards a participatory approach. European Planning Studies Journal. v. 9 Issue 7, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310120079832.

DOUTHWAITE, B. et al. Impact pathway evaluation: an approach for achieving and attributing impact in complex systems. Agricultural Systems, v. 78, 2003, p. 243–265. DOI: 10.1016/S0308-521X(03)00128-8, 2003. Available at: http://boru.pbworks.com/f/ag_syst_IPE.pdf, accessed 01/23/2018.

EMBRAPA – Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária. Embrapa Organization’s main site, 2015. Available at: www.embrapa.br. Access in: 18 mar. 2018.

GOLDSTEIN, H.; RENAULT, C. Contributions of Universities to Regional Economic Development: a quasi- experimental approach. Regional Studies: The Journal of the Regional Studies Association, v. 38, n. 7, October 2004, p. 733-746, n. 14, 2004. Publisher: Routledge, part of the Taylor & Francis Group, DOI: https://doi.org/10. 1080/0034340042000265232.

GREENACRE, P.; GROSS, R.; SPEIRS, J. Innovation Theory: a review of the literature Imperial College Centre for Energy Policy and Technology, 2012. Available at: https://workspace.imperial.ac.uk/icept/Public/Innovation%20 review%20-%20ICEPT%20working%20paper%20version%20(16.05.12).pdf. Accessed: 25 feb. 2018.

HALLSTED, S. I.; THOMPSON, A. W.; LINDAHL, P. Key Elements for Implementing a Strategic Sustainability Perspective in the Product Innovation Process. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 51, p. 277-288, 2013. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepra2013.01.043.

INSEE – National Institute of Statistics and Economics Studies of France, Official site, 2016. Available at: https:// www.fr/en/metadonnees/definition/c1182.

ISRIA – The International School on Research Impact Assessment. ISRIA website, 2017. Available at: http:// theinternationalschoolonria.com/. Accessed: 12 apr. 2018.

JAPIASSU, H.; MARCONDES, D. Pequeno Dicionário de Filosofia. Jorge Zahar Ed. São Paulo, 1989.

JOLY, P. B. et al. Agricultural research impact assessment: issues, methods and challenges. [Research Report] auto-saisine. 2016, 51p. , 2016. Available at: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01431457/ document. Accessed: 03 mar. 2018.

JONKERS, K. et al. Regional Innovation Impact Assessment Framework for universities. EUR 28927 EN; Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2018; ISBN 978-92-79-77048-7. DOI: 10.2760/623825; JRC109020.

KUBY, T. Innovation as a Social Process: what does this mean for impact assessment in agricultural research. Paper presented at a CIAT workshop, Costa Rica, September 1999.

LAW, A. M.; KELTON, W. D. Simulation Modelling and Analysis. 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1991. LUYET, V. et al. A framework to implement Stakeholder participation in environmental projects. Journal of

Environmental Management, v. 111, p. 213-219, 2012. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.026.

MARKUS, L. M.; MAJCHRZAK, A.; GASSER, L. A Design Theory for Systems that Support Emergent Knowledge Processes. MisQuarterly – Special Issue. v. 26, n. 3 (Sep., 2002), p. 179-212. Published by Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota, 2002.

MERGAERT, L.; MINTO, R. Ex-Ante and Ex-Post Evaluations: two sides of the same coin? The Case of Gender Mainstreaming in EU Research Policy. Symposium on Policy Evaluation in the EU. European Journal of Risk Regulation – EJRR/1, 47, DOI: 10.1017/S1867299X0000427X, 2015.

METHERBE, J. C. Conceito de Sistemas. Análise de Sistemas, 1986. Ed. Campus. Rio de Janeiro, p. 31-43.

OECD – Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. Glossary of Key Terms in Evaluation and

Results Based Management, 2002. Available at: http://bit.ly/1KG9WUk.

O’SULLIVAN, D. Applying Innovation. Sage Publishing, Thousand Oaks, California, p 3, 2008.

OXFORD DICTIONARY. English Dictionary. Oxford, 2018. Available at: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/ impact; https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/policy. Accessed on: 02 aug. 2018.

PISANO, U.; LANGE, L.; BERGER, G. Social Innovation in Europe An overview of the concept of social innovation in the context of European initiatives and practices. ESDN Quarterly Report N°36, April 2015. European Sustainable Development Network – Institute for Managing Sustainability. Vienna University of Economics and Business, 2015. Available at: http://www.sd-network.eu/quarterly%20reports/report%20files/pdf/2015-April- Social_Innovation_in_Europe.pdf.

PLANING, P. On the origin of innovations – the opportunity vacuum as a conceptual model for the explanation of innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, v. 6, n. 5. DOI 10.1186/s13731-017-0063-2, 2017.

POPE, J.; ANNANDALE, D.; MORRISON-SAUNDERS, A. Conceptualising sustainability assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, v. 24, p. 595–616, 2004. Available at: http://ac.els-cdn.com/ S0195925504000447/1-s2.0- S0195925504000447-main.pdf?_tid=1bc3edf0-0f22-11e7-86cd-00000aab0f6c&ac dnat=1490202662_8e77bd6cf1bcb0a97eae8ef4b1359772.

RODRIGUES, G. S.; BUSCHINELLI, C.; AVILA, A. F. An Environmental Impact Assessment System for Agricultural Research and Development II: Institutional Learning Experience at Embrapa. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, v. 5, Issue 4 p. 38-56, 2010. Available at: http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_ arttext&pid=S0718-27242010000400004.

UN – United Nations. 23RD UN/Intosai Symposium UN Post – 2015. Development Agenda: the role of SAIs and means of implementation for sustainable development. Department of Economics and Social Affairs, 2015. Available at: http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/usg/statements/mr-wu/2015/03/23rd-unintosai-symposium.html.

UNDG – United Nations Development Group. Results-Based Management Handbook, 2011. Available at: https:// undg.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/WHO-RBM-Handbook-2012.pdf.

WHO – World Health Organization. 1948 Constitution of the World Health Organization. Geneva: World Health Organization, Basic Documents, Forty-fifth edition, Supplement, October 2006. Available at: http://www.who.int/ governance/eb/who_constitution_en.pdf.

WILSON, G. A. The Australian Landcare movement: towards ‘post-productivist’ rural governance? School of Geography, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus PLA 8AA, UK. Journal of Rural Studies, v. 20, p. 461-484. Available at: reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S0743016704000130?token=C92160FEA6BABD531E4AB395BF 6BAED13EDD3C41EBA74E2D59AABF1055AD10DA673593AD7F4E80C37A8D60774C75AA67&originRegion=us- east-1&originCreation=20220919133833.

Downloads

Publicado

2022-12-29

Edição

v. 13 n. 3 (2022): Sustainability in Debate / Sustentabilidade em Debate

Seção

Artigos - Varia

Licença

Copyright (c) 2022 Sustainability in Debate

Creative Commons License

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

A submissão de trabalho(s) científico(s) original(is) pelos autores, na qualidade de titulares do direito de autor do(s) texto(s) enviado(s) ao periódico, nos termos da Lei 9.610/98, implica na cessão de direitos autorais de publicação impressa e/ou digital à  Revista Sustentabilidade em Debate do(s) artigo(s) aprovado(s) para fins da publicação, em um único número da Revista, autorizando-se, ainda, que o(s) trabalho(s) científico(s) aprovado(s) seja(m) divulgado(s) gratuitamente, sem qualquer tipo de ressarcimento a título de direitos autorais, por meio do site da Revista, para fins de leitura, impressão e/ou download do arquivo do texto, a partir da data de aceitação para fins de publicação. Portanto, os autores ao procederem a submissão do(s) artigo(s)   Revista, e, por conseguinte, a cessão gratuita dos direitos autorais relacionados ao trabalho científico enviado, têm plena ciência de que não serão remunerados pela publicação do(s) artigo(s) no periódico.
A Revista encontra-se licenciada sob uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações (Proibição de Realização de Obras Derivadas) 3.0 Brasil, para fins de difusão do conhecimento científico, conforme indicado no sítio da publicação, que permite o compartilhamento do texto e o reconhecimento de sua autoria e publicação original nesta revista.

Os autores têm permissão para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva dos trabalhos publicados na Revista Sustentabilidade em Debate (por exemplo, em um capítulo de livro), desde que seja assinalado que os textos foram originalmente publicados nesta revista e que seja mencionado o DOI correspondente. Os autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir o seu texto online, após a publicação (por exemplo, em repositórios institucionais ou nas suas páginas pessoais).

Os autores declaram expressamente concordar com os termos da presente Declaração de Direito Autoral, que se aplicará a submissão caso seja publicada por esta Revista.

Como Citar

Linhas gerais para construção de um modelo de avaliação de impacto da inovação aplicável a organizações de pesquisa agropecuária. (2022). Sustainability in Debate, 13(3), 189-208. https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v13n3.2022.43702

Artigos Semelhantes

1-10 de 130

Você também pode iniciar uma pesquisa avançada por similaridade para este artigo.

Artigos mais lidos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)