Do agroecology partices help small coffee producers in income generation? A case study in minas gerais
Keywords:
Agroecology, Small Farming, Income generation, Cost Benefit AnalysisAbstract
In this paper, a cost benefit analysis has been developed to compare 14 farms in the East Region of Minas Gerais (Brazil) to analyse whether agroecology can stabilize farmers’ incomes in comparison with conventional practices. Three price scenarios have been used in order to consider coffee price fluctuations. The study shows that agroecological farms, on average, have a value of Net Present Value (NPV) twice bigger than conventional farmers (US$ 54,060/ha against US$ 19,034/ha) for the average price scenario. For the low price scenario, the conventional small farmers show negative values of NPV, whereas agroecological producers still show positive results (US$ -9,8975/ha against US$ 20,479/ha). Then, four farms with different level of production diversification were compared. Results show diversification matters in generating income with bad market conditions, underlining the agroecological practices could be beneficial for small farming in the entire region of study.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Brasileira de Agroecologia
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b67b2/b67b296c4d3b028c918eaf7bf864d9ab589a7b44" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
The copyright of articles published in this journal remains with the authors, with first publication rights for the journal.
License
When published in this open access journal, licensed through CC BY 4.0, articles are distributed free of charge and can be shared and adapted for any purpose, including commercial. As attribution of use, the license requires that due credit be given, with a link to the license and indication of changes. This does not mean that the licensor endorses the use of the information in the article, or the person who used this information. It also implies the impossibility of applying legal or technological measures that restrict the use of the information by third parties.