Agroextractivist logical in the context of socioeconomic changes in the Archipelago Marajó-Pará State, Amazon.
Keywords:
Agroextractivism, family logics, sustainabilityAbstract
The productive logic performed by agroextractivist from the Amazon estuary is one of the ways to sustainable regional development. In this paper we sought to understand how the families based on agroextractivism have adapted and changed their agroecosystems to the current socio-economic context in the Marajó Archipelago. In a scenario of strong economic, social and environmental changes it was possible to identify two significant logics of agroecosystems management takenby the families in a traditional way. In the first one it was observed a strong extractive activity and little insertion into the market; the other one was characterized by a greater inclusion in the formal market, but with significant loss of autonomy in the family's life projects. This implies in affirming that these family agro-ecosystems are grounded in complex social processes and highly integrated into the natural diversity. However, as far as the market technologies intensify, families move away from the extraction, becoming dependent on the seasonality of some products, therefore, less diversified and less autonomous in relation to the formal market.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 autor
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b67b2/b67b296c4d3b028c918eaf7bf864d9ab589a7b44" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
The copyright of articles published in this journal remains with the authors, with first publication rights for the journal.
License
When published in this open access journal, licensed through CC BY 4.0, articles are distributed free of charge and can be shared and adapted for any purpose, including commercial. As attribution of use, the license requires that due credit be given, with a link to the license and indication of changes. This does not mean that the licensor endorses the use of the information in the article, or the person who used this information. It also implies the impossibility of applying legal or technological measures that restrict the use of the information by third parties.