The Domestication of vision

Authors

  • Fernando Fuão

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18830/issn2238-362X.v15.n2.2025.06

Keywords:

camera obscura, photographic machine, representation, perspective, fragmentation, modern city

Abstract

This article explains how the world of mimetic representation from the Quattrocento onwards emerged through optical instruments, primarily the camera obscura. This representation was materialized and structured in architecture and the city so that the laws of perspective and the effect of depth could be effectively realized, producing the effect of perspective, which until then was impossible in the medieval city. This structuring of cities and the way of seeing the world caused a distancing between subject and object, including between the objects themselves, so that this (de)fect could be realized. The article is divided into two parts: the first, ‘The Machine of Fragments’, which addresses the use of optical instruments, mainly the camera obscura, Alberti’s veduta, and Brunelleschi’s peep show, in the construction of these representations. The second, ‘Architectures of Distancing’, addresses the issue of distancing between buildings in the structuring of cities according to the demands of the camera obscura: light and distance. This briefly highlights three city models from the Renaissance to modernity, when the concept of the medieval body-city integrity was fragmented, later also the grid-like cities, established by the basic grid of the perspective representation plan, until reaching the idea of isolation, fragmentation, and the total liberation of the object, of the building, still dictated by photography.

Author Biography

  • Fernando Fuão

    Fernando Freitas Fuão is a full professor at the Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism at UFRGS. He is a professor in the Research and Postgraduate Program in Architecture (PROPAR), and a CNPq researcher. He leads the research group (CNPq): Architecture, Derrida and Approximations.

References

AAVV. La prospettiva rinascimentale. Codificacione e transgressioni. Atti Del convegno internacionale (a cura di Marisa Dalai Emiliani). Firenze: Centro Di. 1980.

AAVV. Giorgi Vasari il Giovane, lá cittá ideale, (a cura de) Virginia Stefanelli. Roma: Officina Edizione. 1970.

ALBERTI, Leon Battista. De Pittura. Roma: GiusLaterza & Figli, 1973.

ALBERTI, Leon Battista. De Re Aedificatoria o Los diez libros de arquitectura. (Facsimil de la edición española de Alonso Gomez. 1582. Madrid). Oviedo: Colegio de Aparejadores y Arquitectos Técnicos. 1975.

BRUNETTA, Gian Piero. I sentieri luminosi, storie di profeti, viandanti, pellegrini e cavalieri dell luce, em Le lanterne magiche. Padova. 1988.

BRYSON, Norman. Herméneutique de la perception, Les Cahiers du Musée Nacional D’Art Moderne, n. 21. P. 103-117.

CRARY, Jonathan. Techniques of the Observer. October n. 45. 1987.

COUCHOT, Edmund. Images, de l’optique au numérique. Paris: Ed. Hermes. 1998.

DAMISH Hubert, La fissure, em Francesco Gurrieri, La ville de Brunelleschi, p. 57-151

EDGERTON, Samuel. The renaissance Rediscover of linear perspective. New York: Icon Edition, 1975.

FLUSER, Vilém. Filosofia da Caixa Preta. São Paulo: Hucitec. 1985.

FOUCAULT, Michel. As palavras e as coisas, uma arqueologia das ciências humanas. Martins Fontes. São Paulo. 1981.

FREUD, Sigmund. O Mal Estar na civilização, São Paulo: Cienbook. 2020.

FUÃO, Fernando Freitas. Cidades Fantasmas. Em https://fernandofuao.blogspot.com/2012/10/cidades-fantasmas.html

FUÃO, Fernando Freitas. FOTOGRAFIA E ARQUITETURA. PIXO - Revista de Arquitetura, Cidade e Contemporaneidade, v. 2, n. 4, 23 abr. 2018.

GALASSI, Peter. Before photography, painting and invention of photography. New York: The Museum of Art Modern. 1981, p. 16.

HAMMOND, John. The camera oscura, a chronicle, Bristol: Adam Hilger Ltd. 1981.

HOLLANDER, Hans. On perspectives. Daidalos, marz 1984, n.11, p. 71-87.

KAUFMANN, Emil. De Ledoux a Le Corbusier, origen y desarrollo de la arquitectura autónoma. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili, 1982.

KITAO, T. Kaori. Imago and Pintura perspective, câmera obscura and Kepler’s optics, em AAVV, “La prospettiva rinascimentale. Codificacione e transgressioni. Atti Del convegno internacionale”. Firenze, 1980,

KEMP, Martin, The science of art. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. 1990.

KUBOVY, Michael, The psycology of perspective and renascence art. Cambridge, Cambridge University Ptress. 1986.

LAPORTE, Dominique. Historia de la mierda. Valencia: Pretextos. 1988.

LYOTARD, J. F. Discurso, Figura. Barcelona: Ed. Gustavo Gili, 1974.

MANETTI, Antonio di Tuccio. A Vida de Brunelleschi. Pensilvânia: Pensylvania State University Press.1970.

MARIN, Louis. Détruire La peinture. Paris: Éditions 85 Galilée. 1985.

MOPURGO, Gaddo. Architettura e tracrizione fotográfica dello spazio. Rasegna, n.20. p. 64-86.

OESCHSLING, Werner. Architecture, perspective, and helpful gesture of geometria, em Daidalos n.11, marz 1984, pp.39-54.

PANOFSKY, Erwin. A perspectiva como forma simbólica. Barcelona: Tusquet Editores. 1985,

PIRENNE, Henri. Optics, painting & photography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1970.

RAMA, Angel. A cidade das Letras. São Paulo: Ed. Brasiliense. 1985.

SEDLMAY, Hans. El arte descentrado. Barcelona: Editorial Labor, 1958.

VASARI, Giorgio. Vidas de Artistas Ilustres (arquitectos, pintores, y escultores). Barcelona: Iberia. 1957.

VINCI, Leonardo da. Tratado de Pintura. Madrid: Editora Nacional.1976.

Published

2025-12-26

How to Cite

The Domestication of vision. (2025). Revista Estética E Semiótica- RES, Aesthetics and Semiotics Magazine, 15(2), 62-85. https://doi.org/10.18830/issn2238-362X.v15.n2.2025.06

Most read articles by the same author(s)