Reforest or perish: ecosystem services provided by riparian vegetation to improve water quality in an urban reservoir (São Paulo, Brazil)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v11n1.2020.28152Palabras clave:
Riparian conservation. Water quality. Water supply. Natural resources management. Environmental valuation. Reforestation.Resumen
We estimated the economic value of ecosystem services provided by the legally protected vegetation in riparian zones (RPA- riparian protected areas) of watercourses of the Guarapiranga Reservoir watershed (São Paulo, Brazil), considering two scenarios: (i) the value of ecosystem services provided if the RPA recovery complies with the applicable environmental legislation; and (ii) the year 2030, maintaining the urbanization rate and the loss of vegetation cover in the watershed observed between 1986 and 2010. Accomplishing the first scenario demands reforesting 5,917.5 ha of the RPA, which may reduce the annual expenses with chemicals for water treatment and save USD 181.774 per 1000 m3 of treated water. For 2030, we estimated a loss of 6,220 ha of vegetation cover in the RPA (1986 as the initial reference). The loss of ecosystem services provided by RPA would result in an accumulated increase of about USD 318 million in water treatment costs between 2011 and 2030.
Referencias
ALARCON, G.G., AYANU, Y., FANTINI, A.C., FARLEY, J., SCHMITT FILHO, A., KOELLNER, T., 2015. Weakening the Brazilian legislation for forest conservation has severe impacts for ecosystem services in the Atlantic Southern Forest. Land Use Policy 47, 1”“11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.03.011
ANDRADE, M.R.M., SALIM, A., ROSSINI-PENTEADO, D., COSTA, J.A., SOUZA, A.A., SAAD, A.R., OLIVEIRA, A.M.S., 2015. Mapeamento do Uso da Terra para Avaliação da Qualidade das Águas do Reservatório Guarapiranga. Geociências 34, 258”“274.
ANTONIAZZI, L., SARTORELLI, P., COSTA, K., BASSO, I., 2016. Restauração Florestal em cadeias agropecuárias para adequação ao Código Florestal: análise econômica de oito estados brasileiros. São Paulo: Agrocoine/INPUT.
ARAÚJO, R., 2017. São Paulo, a Light e a Represa Guarapiranga, in: BICUDO, C.E.M., BICUDO, D.C. (Eds.), 100 Anos Da Represa Guarapiranga: Lições e Desafios. Curitiba: Editora CRV, pp. 17”“32.
BRITO, F.M., MIRAGLIA, S.G.E.K., SEMENSATTO, D., 2018. Ecosystem services of the Guarapiranga Reservoir watershed (São Paulo, Brazil): value of water supply and implications for management strategies. International Journal of Urban Sustainaible Developmet 10, 49”“59. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2018.1442336
BROGNA, D., DUFRÊNE, M., MICHEZ, A., LATLI, A., JACOBS, S., VINCKE, C., DENDONCKER, N., 2018. Forest cover correlates with good biological water quality. Insights from a regional study (Wallonia, Belgium). Journal of Environmental Management 211, 9”“21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.01.017
BROGNA, D., VINCKE, C., BROSTAUX, Y., SOYEURT, H., DUFRÊNE, M., DENDONCKER, N., 2017. How does forest cover impact water flows and ecosystem services? Insights from “real-life” catchments in Wallonia (Belgium). Ecological Indicators 72, 675”“685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.08.011
BUFFIN-BÉLANGER, T., BIRON, P.M., LAROCQUE, M., DEMERS, S., OLSEN, T., CHONÉ, G., OUELLET, M.-A., CLOUTIER, C.-A., DESJARLAIS, C., EYQUEM, J., 2015. Freedom space for rivers: An economically viable river management concept in a changing climate. Geomorphology 251, 137”“148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.05.013
CELENTANO, D., ROUSSEAU, G.X., ENGEL, V.L., ZELARAYÁN, M., OLIVEIRA, E.C., ARAUJO, A.C.M., DE MOURA, E.G., 2017. Degradation of Riparian Forest Affects Soil Properties and Ecosystem Services Provision in Eastern Amazon of Brazil. Land and Degradation Development 28, 482”“493. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2547
CHASE, J.W., BENOY, G.A., HANN, S.W.R., CULP, J.M., 2016. Small differences in riparian vegetation significantly reduce land use impacts on stream flow and water quality in small agricultural watersheds. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 71, 194”“205. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.71.3.194
COSTANZA, R., D’ARGE, R., DE GROOT, R., FARBER, S., GRASSO, M., HANNON, B., LIMBURG, K., NAEEM, S., O’NEILL, R. V., PARUELO, J., RASKIN, R.G., SUTTON, P., VAN DEN BELT, M., 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387, 253”“260. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
COSTANZA, R., DE GROOT, R., BRAAT, L., KUBISZEWSKI, I., FIORAMONTI, L., SUTTON, P., FARBER, S., GRASSO, M., 2017. Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosystems Services 28, 1”“16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008
DE GROOT, R., BRANDER, L., VAN DER PLOEG, S., COSTANZA, R., BERNARD, F., BRAAT, L., CHRISTIE, M., CROSSMAN, N., GHERMANDI, A., HEIN, L., HUSSAIN, S., KUMAR, P., MCVITTIE, A., PORTELA, R., RODRIGUEZ, L.C., TEN BRINK, P., VAN BEUKERING, P., 2012. Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosystems Services 1, 50”“61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.005
ERIKSSON, L.O., LÖFGREN, S., ÖHMAN, K., 2011. Implications for forest management of the EU Water Framework Directive’s stream water quality requirements ”” A modeling approach. Forest Policy and Economics 13, 284”“291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.02.002
ERNST, C., GULLICK, R., NIXON, K., 2004. Protecting the Source: Conserving Forests to Protect Water. American Water Working Association 30, 1”“5.
FIQUEPRON, J., GARCIA, S., STENGER, A., 2013. Land use impact on water quality: Valuing forest services in terms of the water supply sector. Journal of Environmental Management 126, 113”“121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.04.002
FONTANA, L., ALBUQUERQUE, A.L.S., BRENNER, M., BONOTTO, D.M., SABARIS, T.P.P., PIRES, M.A.F., COTRIM, M.E.B., BICUDO, D.C., 2014. The eutrophication history of a tropical water supply reservoir in Brazil. Journal of Paleolimnology 51, 29”“43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10933-013-9753-3
GONZÁLEZ, E., FELIPE-LUCIA, M.R., BOURGEOIS, B., BOZ, B., NILSSON, C., PALMER, G., SHER, A.A., 2017. Integrative conservation of riparian zones. Biological Conservation 211, 20”“29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.035
GROLLEAU, G., MCCANN, L.M.J., 2012. Designing watershed programs to pay farmers for water quality services: Case studies of Munich and New York City. Ecological Economics 76, 87”“94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.02.006
GUNDERSEN, P., LAURÉN, A., FINÉR, L., RING, E., KOIVUSALO, H., SÆTERSDAL, M., WESLIEN, J.O., SIGURDSSON, B.D., HÖGBOM, L., LAINE, J., HANSEN, K., 2010. Environmental services provided from riparian forests in the nordic countries. Ambio 39, 555”“566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-010-0073-9
IKEMATSU, P., 2014 Conflitos e desafios na gestão da Bacia Hidrográfica do Reservatório Guarapiranga. Dissertação (Mestrado em Paisagem e Ambiente) - Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2014. doi:10.11606/D.16.2014.tde-30062014-155937
ISSII, T.M., ROMERO, A.C., ATTANÁSIO-JUNIOR, M.R., PEREIRA-SILVA, E.F.L., HARDT, E., in press. The role of legal protection in forest conservation in an urban matrix. Floresta e Ambiente.
LAUDON, H., KUGLEROVÁ, L., SPONSELLER, R.A., FUTTER, M., NORDIN, A., BISHOP, K., LUNDMARK, T., EGNELL, G., GREN, A.M.A., Ã…GREN, A.M., 2016. The role of biogeochemical hotspots, landscape heterogeneity, and hydrological connectivity for minimizing forestry effects on water quality. Ambio 45, 152”“162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0751-8
LEAL, P., MOSCHINI-CARLOS, V., LÓPEZ-DOVAL, J., CINTRA, J., YAMAMOTO, J., BITENCOURT, M., SANTOS, R., ABREU, G., POMPÊO, M., 2017. Impact of copper sulfate application at an urban Brazilian reservoir: A geostatistical and ecotoxicological approach. Science of the Total Environment 618, 621”“634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.095
LOVELL, S.T., SULLIVAN, W.C., 2006. Environmental benefits of conservation buffers in the United States: Evidence, promise, and open questions. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 112, 249”“260. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AGEE.2005.08.002
MELLO, K. DE, VALENTE, R.A., RANDHIR, T.O., SANTOS, A.C.A. DOS, VETTORAZZI, C.A., 2018. Effects of land use and land cover on water quality of low-order streams in Southeastern Brazil: Watershed versus riparian zone. Catena 167, 130”“138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.04.027
MOKONDOKO, P., MANSON, R.H., PÉREZ-MAQUEO, O., 2016. Assessing the service of water quality regulation by quantifying the effects of land use on water quality and public health in central Veracruz, Mexico. Ecosystems Services 22, 161”“173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.001
OTOMO, J.I., SILVA, S.C., SANTOS, W.D.S., JARDIM, E.A.M., POMPÊO, M., 2015. Avaliação de Políticas para Preservação e Recuperação de Mananciais de Abastecimento Público da Região Metropolitana de São Paulo. In: POMPÊO, MARCELO, MOSCHINI-CARLOS, V.M., NISHIMURA, P.Y., SILVA, S.C., DOVAL, J.C.L. (Eds.), Ecologia de Reservatórios e Interfaces. Instituto de Biociências da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, pp. 376”“395.
ROMERO, A.C., ISSII, T.M., PEREIRA-SILVA, E.F.L., HARDT, E., 2018. Effects of urban sprawl on forest conservation in a metropolitan water source area. Revista Árvore 42, e420114. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-90882018000100014
SABESP, 2015. Eletronic publishing at SABESP: Crise hídrica, estratégia e soluções da Sabesp para a Região Metropolitana de São Paulo. São Paulo. Available in: http://site.sabesp.com.br/site/uploads/file/crisehidrica/chess_crise_hidrica.pdf. Accessed in 08 May 2018.
São Paulo (State), 2011. Eletronic publishing at Secretaria de Infraestrutura e Meio Ambiente do Estado de São Paulo: Atualização do Plano de Desenvolvimento e Proteção Ambiental da Bacia Hidrográfica do Guarapiranga. São Paulo. Available in: https://www.infraestruturameioambiente.sp.gov.br/cpla/2013/03/aprm-area-de-protecao-e-recuperacao-de-mananciais/ Acessed in 09 May 2018.
SEMENSATTO, D., ASAMI, T., 2017. Além dos índices numéricos: a qualidade da água da Represa Guarapiranga ao longo do tempo. In: BICUDO, C.E.M., BICUDO, D.C. (Eds.). 100 Anos Da Represa Guarapiranga: Lições e Desafios. Curitiba: Editora CRV, pp. 383”“400.
SPAROVEK, G., BERNDES, G., GIAROLI, A., BARRETTO, A.G.O.P., KLUG, I.L.F., 2011. The revision of the Brazilian Forest Act: increased deforestation or a historic step towards balancing agricultural development and nature conservation? Environmental Science and Policy 16, 65”“72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2011.10.008
SUN, X., CRITTENDEN, J.C., LI, F., LU, Z., DOU, X., 2018. Urban expansion simulation and the spatio-temporal changes of ecosystem services, a case study in Atlanta Metropolitan area, USA. Science of the Total Environment 622”“623, 974”“987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.062
SWEENEY, B.W., BOTT, T.L., JACKSON, J.K., KAPLAN, L.A., NEWBOLD, J.D., STANDLEY, L.J., HESSION, W.C., HORWITZ, R.J., 2004. Riparian deforestation, stream narrowing, and loss of stream ecosystem services. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U. S. A. 101, 14132”“14137. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0405895101
TAMBOSI, L.R., VIDAL, M.M., FERRAZ, S.F. DE B., METZGER, J.P., 2015. Funções eco-hidrológicas das florestas nativas e o Código Florestal. Estudos Avançados 29, 151”“162. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40142015000200010
VAN LOOY, K., TORMOS, T., SOUCHON, Y., GILVEAR, D., 2017. Analyzing riparian zone ecosystem services bundles to instruct river management. Journal International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management 13, 330”“341. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2017.1365773
WHATELY, M., CUNHA, P., 2006. Seminário Guarapiranga 2006: proposição de ações prioritárias para garantir água de boa qualidade para abastecimento público. São Paulo: Instituto Socioambiental.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2020 Sustentabilidade em Debate
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b52d/0b52d46edc111e449a0fbf055f579b35f69999ca" alt="Creative Commons License"
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
La presentación de la(s) obra(s) científica(s) original(es) por parte de los autores, como titulares de los derechos de autor de los textos enviados a la revista, de conformidad con la Ley 9.610/98, implica la cesión de derechos de autor de publicaciones impresas y/o digitales a la Revista de Sustenibilidad en Debate de los artículos aprobados para fines de publicación, en un único número de la Revista, autorizando también que la(s) obra(s) científica(s) aprobada(s) se divulguen de forma gratuita, sin ningún tipo de reembolso de derechos de autor, a través del sitio web de a Revista, para leer, imprimir y/o descargar el archivo de texto, a partir de la fecha de aceptación para publicación. Por lo tanto, los autores, al presentar los artículos a la Revista y, en consecuencia, la libre cesión de derechos de autor relacionados con el trabajo científico presentado, son plenamente conscientes de que no serán remunerados por la publicación de los artículos en la revista.Â
La Revista está licenciada bajo una licencia no comercial y sin derivaciones Creative Commons (No permite la realización de obras derivadas) 3.0 Brasil, con el propósito de difundir conocimientos científicos, como se indica en el sitio web de la publicación, que permite el intercambio del texto y el reconocimiento de su autoría y publicación original en esta revista.
Los autores pueden asumir contratos adicionales por separado, para la distribución no exclusiva de las obras publicadas en la revista Sustenibilidad en Debate (por ejemplo, en un capítulo de libro), siempre que se indique que los textos se publicaron originalmente en esta revista y que se menciona el DOI correspondiente. Se permite y incentiva a los autores a publicar y distribuir su texto online después de su publicación (por ejemplo, en repositorios institucionales o en sus páginas personales).Â
Los autores aceptan expresamente los términos de esta Declaración de Derechos de Autor, que se aplicará a la presentación si es publicada por esta Revista.