Citizen science and engaged visual anthropology for climate justice: a study of the Emergent Ecologies platform
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v17n1.2026.59578Keywords:
Emergent Ecologies, Citizen science, Engaged Research, Visual anthropology, Climate justiceAbstract
Despite advances in explaining the causes of climate change, greater attention is still needed to the unequal distribution of impacts and adaptation modes. This article argues that scientific platforms that integrate social science research, digital media, and socio-environmental activism create spaces for the co-production of knowledge and highlight solutions emerging from affected areas. Critical analyses of the political-epistemological, methodological, and ethical foundations of such initiatives remain scarce. To address this gap, we examine multimodal content from the Emergent Ecologies platform, with a particular focus on the Women in Artisanal Fishing section. Drawing on citizen science and engaged visual anthropology approaches, the analysis is organised around three axes: the visual as co-production; engagement as method; and guidelines and practices as an open field of possibilities. Findings suggest that integrating these approaches can strengthen transformative action toward sustainability and contribute to climate justice.
References
ACSELRAD, H. Ambientalização das lutas sociais: o caso do movimento por justiça ambiental. Estudos Avançados, São Paulo: Instituto de Estudos Avançados/USP, v. 24, n. 68, p. 103-119, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40142010000100010
ADAMS, C.; ARAUJO, L. G.; CORDEIRO-BEDUSCHI, L. Governança florestal: três décadas de avanços. Estudos avançados, v. 36, n. 106, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-4014.2022.36106.010
ALBERT, A. et al. Citizen Social Science: new and established approaches to participation in social research. In: VOHLAND, K. et al. (Eds.). The Science of Citizen Science. Cham: Springer, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_7
ALIER, J. M. O ecologismo dos pobres: conflitos ambientais e linguagens de valoração. São Paulo: Contexto, 2007.
BULLARD, R. Confronting Environmental Racism: voices from the grassroots. Boston: South End Press, 1993.
BURSZTYN, M.; TÁVORA, R. Sustentabilidade e redução das vulnerabilidades: a necessária construção de pontes entre as ciências e a sociedade. Ciência e Cultura, v. 75, n. 2, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5935/2317-6660.20230030
BUSCHER, B. The truth about nature: environmentalism in the era of post-truth and platform capitalism. Oakland: University of California Press, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520976153
CUNHA, M.; ALMEIDA, M. Indigenous people, traditional people, and conservation in the Amazon. Daedalus, v. 129, n. 2, p. 315, 2000.
DA SILVA NETO, V. J.; CHIARINI, T. The Platformization of Science: towards a scientific digital platform taxonomy. Minerva, v. 61, p. 1-29, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-022-09477-6
ECSA – European Citizen Science Association. Ten Principles of Citizen Science. Berlin, 2015. Available at: http://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/XPR2N. Accessed on: 5 Jul. 2025.
EMERGENT ECOLOGIES. Living with Environmental Change in Brazil. San Diego State University, 2024. Available at: https://www.emergentecologies.net/en. Accessed on: 5 Jul. 2025.
ERIKSEN, T. H. Engaged Anthropology: the Norwegian case. Anthropology Today, v. 22, n. 2, p. 12-16, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8322.2006.00423.x
FLEURY, L.; MIGUEL, J.; TADDEI, R. Mudanças climáticas, ciência e sociedade. Sociologias, Porto Alegre, v. 21, n. 51, p. 18–42, May/Aug. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/15174522-0215101
HAKLAY, M. et al. Contours of Citizen Science: a vignette study. Royal Society Open Science, v. 8, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.202108
HARDING, S. Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: what is strong objectivity? In: ALCOFF, L.; POTTER, E. (Eds.). Feminist Epistemologies. London: Routledge, 1993.
HECKER, S. et al. Innovation in Citizen Science – Perspectives on Science-Policy Advances. Citizen Science: theory and practice, v. 3, n. 1, p. 1-14, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.114
HENKE, J. Can Citizen Science in the Humanities and Social Sciences Deliver on the Sustainability Goals? Sustainability, v. 14, n. 3, p. 1234-1247, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159012
INGOLD, T.; KURTTILA, T. Perceiving the Environment in Finnish Lapland. Body & Society, v. 6, n. 3-4, p. 183-196, 2000 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X00006003010
.
IRWIN, A. Citizen Science: a study of people, expertise and sustainable development. London: Routledge, 1995.
JASANOFF, S. Ordering knowledge, ordering society. In: JASANOFF, S. (Ed.). States of knowledge:the co-production of science and the social order. London: Routledge, 2004.
JASANOFF, S. Knowledge for justice: a framework for social-epistemic research. Climatic Change, v. 169, n. 36, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03275-x
KYTHREOTIS, A. P.; MANTYKA-PRINGLE, C.; MERCER, T. G.; WHITMARSH, L. E.; CORNER, A.; PAAVOLA, J.; CHAMBERS, C.; MILLER, B. A.; CASTREE, N. Citizen Social Science for More Integrative and Effective Climate Action: a sciencepolicy perspective. Frontiers in Environmental Science, v. 7, art. 10, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2019.00010
LASSITER, L. E. Collaborative Ethnography and Public Anthropology. Current Anthropology, v. 46, n. 1, p. 83- 106, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/425658
LATOUR, B. Politics of Nature: how to bring the sciences into democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674039964
LIEBENBERG, L. The visual image as discussion point: increasing validity in boundary crossing research. Qualitative Research, v. 9, n. 4, p. 441–467, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109337877
LOZANO, A. L. Colaboração e autoria na etnografia: um olhar crítico. Revista Brasileira de Antropologia, v. 65, n. 1, p. 1-19, 2022.
LOW, S. M.; MERRY, S. E. Engaged Anthropology: diversity and dilemmas. Current Anthropology, v. 51, S2, p. S203-S226, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/653837
O’BRIEN, K. Global environmental change II: from adaptation to deliberate transformation. Progress in Human Geography, v. 36, n. 5, p. 667-676, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132511425767
OECD. Embedding Citizen Science into Research Policy and Practice. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2025.
PALECO, M. et al. Addressing Diversity and Inclusion in Citizen Science: lessons learned. Citizen Science: theory and practice, v. 6, n. 1, p. 1-10, 2021.
PARGUEL, B. Data Governance in Anthropology: co-negotiated plans for open science. Journal of Anthropological Research, v. 77, n. 4, p. 582-600, 2021.
PINK, S. Doing visual ethnography. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781036232306
PINK, S.; ABRAM, S. (Eds.). Media, anthropology and public engagement. New York; Oxford: Berghahn Books, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3167/9781782388463
POLK, M.; KNUTSSON, P. Participation, Value Rationality and Mutual Learning in Transdisciplinary Knowledge Production for Sustainable Development. Environmental Education Research, v. 14, n. 6, p. 643-653, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620802464841
ROCHA, L. Visual Data and Open Science in Anthropology: challenges and possibilities. Visual Anthropology Review, v. 37, n. 1, p. 56-71, 2021.
SAITO, C. H.; BURSZTYN, M.; MERTENS, F.; MESQUITA, P.; DOBRE, C. Denialism as a political force and sustainability setbacks. Sustainability in Debate, [S. l.], v. 16, n. 2, p. 6–11, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v16n2.2025.59314
SCHLOSBERG, D.; COLLINS, L. B. From Environmental to Climate Justice: climate change and the discourse of environmental justice. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: climate change, v. 5, p. 359-374, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.275
SCOONES, I.; STIRLING, A.; ABROL, D.; ATELA, J.; CHARLI-JOSEPH, L.; EAKIN, H.; ELY, A.; OLSSON, P.; PEREIRA, L.; PRIYA, R.; VAN ZWANENBERG, P.; YANG, L. Transformations to sustainability: combining structural, systemic and enabling approaches. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, v. 42, p. 65-75, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.12.004
TEMPER, L. et al. The Global Environmental Justice Atlas (EJAtlas): ecological distribution conflicts as forces for sustainability. Sustainability Science, v. 13, p. 573–584, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0563-4
TENGÖ, M. et al. Co-production of Knowledge for Sustainability: lessons from local and indigenous knowledge. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, v. 49, p. 10-20, 2021.
TSING, A. L. et al. Field Guide to the Patchy Anthropocene: the new nature. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2024.
TSING, A. L. Attunement: form in motion. In: JONES, C.; BELL, A. M.; NIMROD, S. (Eds.). Symbionts: contemporary artists and the biosphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2022. pp. 86–95.
TURNHOUT, E.; METZE, T.; WYBORN, C.; KLENK, N.; LOUDER, E. The Politics of Co-Production: participation, power, and transformation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, v. 42, p. 15-21, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.11.009
UNEP – United Nations Environment Programme. Enhancing Citizen Science Contributions to Environmental Policy. Nairobi: UNEP, 2024.
UNESCO. Recommendation on Open Science. Paris: UNESCO Publishing, 2021.
VAN DIJCK, J.; POELL, T.; WAAL, M. The Platform Society. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190889760.001.0001
VAN NOORDWIJK, T. et al. Creating Positive Environmental Impact Through Citizen Science. In: VOHLAND, K. et al. (Eds.). The Science of Citizen Science. Cham: Springer, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_19
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sustainability in Debate

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
SUSTAINABILITY IN DEBATE – Copyright Statement
The submission of original scientific work(s) by the authors, as the copyright holders of the text(s) sent to the journal, under the terms of Law 9.610/98, implies in the concession of copyrights of printed and/or digital publication to the Sustainability in Debate Journal of the article(s) approved for publication purposes, in a single issue of the journal. Furthermore, approved scientific work(s) will be released without any charge, or any kind of copyright reimbursement, through the journal’s website, for reading, printing and/or downloading of the text file, from the date of acceptance for publication purposes. Therefore, the authors, when submitting the article (s) to the journal, and gratuitous assignment of copyrights related to the submitted scientific work, are fully aware that they will not be remunerated for the publication of the article(s) in the journal.
The Sustainability in Debate Journal is licensed under Creative Commons License – Non-Commercial-No-Derivation Attribution (Derivative Work Ban) 3.0 Brazil, aiming at dissemination of scientific knowledge, as indicated on the journal's website, which allows the text to be shared, and be recognized in regards to its authorship and original publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to sign additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the works published in the Sustainability in Debate Journal (for example, in a book chapter), provided that it is expressed the texts were originally published in this journal. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their text online, following publication in Sustainability in Debate (e.g. in institutional repositories or their personal pages). The authors expressly agree to the terms of this Copyright Statement, which will be applied following the submission and publishing by this journal.


