Os Desafios de uma Política Nacional de Pagamentos por Serviços Ambientais:
lições a partir do caso do Proambiente
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v2n1.2011.3909Keywords:
Payments for Environmental Services, National Policy, ProambienteAbstract
This article discusses the Payments for Environmental Services (PES) as a policy
tool, departing from the Proambiente pilot experience. The analytical approach
used was to develop theoretical and technical considerations to deal with the
challenges for an effective PES policy. Theoretically, the concept of externality
used for the design of market based scheme should be replaced by public good in
policy based schemes. Technically, challenges ly on the difficulties of reducing
transaction costs and scaling-up local project experiences, such as Proambiente.
References
qual a estratégia para o Brasil? São Paulo,
Novos Estudos, 87:97-113, julho 2010.
ALENCAR, A., MICOL, L., REID, J., AMEND,
M., OLIVEIRA, M., ZEIDERMANN, V.,
CABRAL DE SOUSA Jr. W. A pavimentação
da BR-163 e os desafios à sustentabilidade:
uma análise econômica social e ambiental. Belo
Horizonte, 2005. 29p. il. 30 cm.
BARBIER, E. B. A Global Green New Deal.
Relatório para ETB/UNEP. Laramie, Universidade
de Wyoming, Fevereiro, 2009.
BARTON, J.R. Eco-dependency in Latin
America. Singapore, Journal of Tropical
Geography 27 (2), 134-149, 2006.
BECKER, B. K. 1998. Amazônia. 6 ed. São
Paulo: Ática, 1998.
CE. The economics of ecosystems and
biodiversity: an interim report European
Communities, 2008.
COASE, R. H. The Problem of Social Cost.
Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1-44, 1960.
DAILY, G. C. e ELLISON, K. “Making
Conservation Profitable”. Conservation in
Practice vol. 4, 2, 2002.
FEARNSIDE, P. M. Desmatamento na Amazônia:
dinâmica, impactos e controle. Acta Amazônica,
vol. 36(3) 2006:206-400.
GRANJA e BARROS, F. et al. Poverty and
Environmental Degradation: the Kuznets
Environmental Curve for the Brazilian Case.
Working paper 267. Universidade de Brasília.
Depto. de Economia, 2002.
HARDIN, G. The Tragedy of the Commons.
Science, 13. Vol. 162, nº 3859, pp. 1243-1248.
Dezembro de 1968.
KOSOY, N., MARTINEZ-TUNA, M.,
MURADIAN, R. AND MARTINEZ-ALIER, J.
Payments for Environmental Services in
Watersheds: Insights from a Comparative Study
of two Cases in Central America. Seminar on
Environmental Services and Financing for the
Protection and Sustainable Use of Ecosystem.
Geneva, 10-11 Outubro 2005.
LANDELL-MILLS, N. AND PORRAS, T. I.
Silver bullet of fools’ gold? A global review of
markets for forest environmental services and
their impact on the poor. Instruments for
sustainable private sector forestry series.
International Institute for Environment and
Development, Londres, 2002.
LOPES, R. Environmental Degradation and
Economic Openness in LDCs: The Poverty
Linkage. American Journal of Agricultural
Economics, vol. 74, nº 5, Proceedings Issue
(Dec., 1992), p. 1138-1143.
MA - Millennium Ecosystem Assessment.
Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis.
OLIVEIRA, L. R.; BURSZTYN. M. Conflitos
socioambientais nas reservas legais em bloco: o
caso do PA Margarida Alves, em Rondônia. In:
THEODORO, S. H. (Org.). 2005. Mediação de
conflitos socioambientais. Rio de Janeiro:
Garamond, 2005.
OLIVEIRA, L. R.; FALEIRO, A.
PROAMBIENTE: Um modelo para o desenvolvimento
equilibrada da região amazônica.
Brasília: Contag, 2002. ”“ (Mímeo)
PAGIOLA, S.; BISHOP, J. e LANDELL-MILL,
N. (eds.) Selling Forest Environmental
Services. Market-based Mechanisms for
Conservation and Development. Londres,
Earthcan Publications, 2002. 299p.
PAGIOLA, S., AGOSTINI, P., GOBBI, J., DE
HAAN, C., IBRAHIM, M., MURGUEITIO, E.
RAMÍREZ, E., ROSALES, M. AND RUIZ, J.
P. Paying for Biodiversity Conservation Services
in Agricultural Landscapes. Environment
Department Paper, 96. Environmental
Economics Series. Washington, DC, World Bank,
2004.
PFAFF, A., ET AL. Road Investments, Spatial
Intensification and Deforestation in the
Brazilian Amazon. Columbia University. 2005.
24 pp.
POATS, S.V. Compensation for Environmental
Services and Poverty Alleviation in Latin
America. Report of the Latin America Regional
Workshop. Quito-Ecuador. Rio de Janeiro,
2006.
SHIKI, S. (Coord.). Bases Conceituais para uma
Política de Serviços Ambientais para o Desenvolvimento.
Relatório Final do Grupo de Trabalho.
Ministério do Meio Ambiente, dez. 2006.
UN - Glossary of Environment Statistics,
Studies in Methods, Series F, No. 67, United
Nations, New York, 1997.
UNEP ”“ United Nations Environmental
Programme. Background paper for the ministerial
consultations. Discussion paper, UNEP/
GCSS.XI/10/Add.1, Dezembro de 2009.
WUNDER, S., S. ENGEL, AND S. PAGIOLA.
Taking stock: a comparative analysis of payments
for environmental services programs in developed
and developing countries. Ecological
Economics, 65, 2008: 834”“852.
WUNDER, S. Necessary Conditions for
Ecossystem Service Payments. Conferência
Economics and Conservation in the Tropics:
A Strategic Dialogue. Conference Paper Series.
Moore Foundation
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2011 Sustentabilidade em Debate
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
SUSTAINABILITY IN DEBATE – Copyright Statement
The submission of original scientific work(s) by the authors, as the copyright holders of the text(s) sent to the journal, under the terms of Law 9.610/98, implies in the concession of copyrights of printed and/or digital publication to the Sustainability in Debate Journal of the article(s) approved for publication purposes, in a single issue of the journal. Furthermore, approved scientific work(s) will be released without any charge, or any kind of copyright reimbursement, through the journal’s website, for reading, printing and/or downloading of the text file, from the date of acceptance for publication purposes. Therefore, the authors, when submitting the article (s) to the journal, and gratuitous assignment of copyrights related to the submitted scientific work, are fully aware that they will not be remunerated for the publication of the article(s) in the journal.
The Sustainability in Debate Journal is licensed under Creative Commons License – Non-Commercial-No-Derivation Attribution (Derivative Work Ban) 3.0 Brazil, aiming at dissemination of scientific knowledge, as indicated on the journal's website, which allows the text to be shared, and be recognized in regards to its authorship and original publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to sign additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the works published in the Sustainability in Debate Journal (for example, in a book chapter), provided that it is expressed the texts were originally published in this journal. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their text online, following publication in Sustainability in Debate (e.g. in institutional repositories or their personal pages). The authors expressly agree to the terms of this Copyright Statement, which will be applied following the submission and publishing by this journal.
