COP30 CHALLENGES: WHERE ARE EMPLOYMENT AND INCOME IN THE BRAZILIAN BIOECONOMY (2011–2021)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18829/2317-921X.2025.e60197Palabras clave:
Bioeconomy; Biological Base; Spatial Distribution; Formality, COP30.Resumen
This article addresses the lack of comparable metrics to guide analysis of the bioeconomy in Brazil, a topic that has been treated as a driver of development and climate change but lacks comparable metrics to guide policies and investments. This article aims to measure and characterize the 100% BIO core using microdata from the RAIS (2011–2021) based on two indicators: the core's share of formal employment and its share of the wage bill. This is a quantitative-descriptive study, with sectoral (CNAE) and territorial breakdowns and an assessment of the temporal evolution of these indicators. The results show stability in the share of formal employment at a constant level and a similar share of the wage bill, with a slight increase at the end of the series. Behind this average stability, spatial reconfiguration is observed, with relative gains in the Central-West and South regions, associated with agro-industrial densification, and a loss of traction of traditional primary complexes in states in the Southeast and Northeast. At the sectoral level, the transformation links linked to biomass stand out, such as food and beverage processing, slaughter and dairy, and the pulp and paper chain. In new agricultural fronts, formal employment remained resilient in the 2020–2021 biennium, but gaps persist between employment and income participation where local processing is incipient. In light of these findings, the two indicators used allow prioritizing territories and monitoring initiatives by revealing where the 100% BIO core generates not only formal jobs but also a greater share of income. The study's contribution is to offer standardized and replicable measurement with administrative data, enabling sectoral and territorial comparisons and continuous monitoring of the Brazilian bioeconomy.
Referencias
Ansanelli, S. L. de M., Moraes, C. S. B. de, & Piglialarmi, D. C. J. (2025). Green jobs: Empirical evidence and methodological approaches. Observatorio de la Economy Latinoamericana, 23 (2), e9037. https://doi.org/10.55905/oelv23n2-097
Barbosa, M.O., Rivas, A.A.F., Oliveira, L.A., & Buenafuente, S.M.F. (2021). Bioeconomy: A new path to sustainability in the Amazon? Research, Society and Development, 10 (10), e41101018545. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i10.18545
Brazil. National Bioeconomy Commission. (2024a). National bioeconomy development plan: Contextualization chapter, preliminary version for CNBio’s consideration. Federal Government of Brazil.
Brazil. Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply. (2021). Sectoral plan for adaptation to climate change and low carbon agriculture 2020–2030: ABC+ operational plan.
Brazil. Ministry of Finance, Secretariat of Economic Policy. (2023a). Brazilian Sustainable Taxonomy: Action plan for public consultation. Brasília, DF: Ministry of Finance. https://www.gov.br/fazenda/pt-br/orgaos/spe/taxonomia-sustentavel-brasileira/taxonomia-sustentavel-brasileira.pdf
Brazil. Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change. (2023b). Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Deforestation in the Legal Amazon (PPCDAm), Phase V: Draft under public consultation. Extraordinary Secretariat for Deforestation Control and Territorial Environmental Planning. https://www.socioambiental.org/sites/default/files/noticias-e-posts/2023-06/PPCDAm_2023PDF_230605_074206.pdf
Brazil. (2024b). Decree No. 12,044, of June 5, 2024, establishes the National Bioeconomy Strategy. Brazilian Federal Official Gazette. Diário Oficial da União. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2024/decreto/d12044.htm
Brazil. Ministry of Labor and Employment, Secretariat of Public Employment Policies, Department of Employment and Wages, & General Coordination of Labor Statistics. (2007). RAIS 2006: Statistical data on employability in Brazil. Brasília, DF: Ministry of Labor and Employment. https://acesso.mte.gov.br/lumis/portal/file/fileDownload.jsp?fileId=8A7C82C339979E2D01399BD70C1F7008
Bugge, M. M., Hansen, T., & Klitkou, A. (2016). What is the bioeconomy? A review of the literature. Sustainability, 8(7), 691.
Carayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D., & Campbell, D. F. (2012). The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of innovation and entrepreneurship, 1(1), 2.
Carbonell, SAM, Cortez, LAB, Madi, LFC, Anefalos, LC, Baldassin Junior, R., & Leal, RLV (2021). Bioeconomy in Brazil: Opportunities and guidelines for research and public policy for regional development. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 15 (6), 1675–1695. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.2263
Cechin, AD, & Veiga, JED (2010). Georgescu-Roegen 's ecological and evolutionary economics. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 30, 438-454.
Fernandes, TLX, Trovão, CJBM, Alves, JS, Fornazier, A., & Cruz, AA (2024). Determinants of job retention in times of Industry 4.0: The case of agriculture in Brazil. Journal of Rural Economics and Sociology, 62 (4), e274589. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9479.2023.274589
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations - FAO. (2024). Bioeconomy for sustainable food and agriculture: A global opportunity — Position paper. https://doi.org/10.4060/cd1976en
Gama, A.P., & Brasileiro, T.S.A. (2024). Innovative territories of the bioeconomy: A conceptual approach through a systematic literature review. Brazilian Journal of Economics, 78, e122024. https://doi.org/10.5935/0034-7140.20240012
Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1966). Analytical economics: issues and problems. HarvardUniversity Press.
Lima, CZ, & Pinto, TP (2022). Bioeconomy GDP: Methods and supply relations (Paper presented at the 50th National Economics Meeting – ANPEC, Fortaleza-CE, December 6–9, 2022). https://www.anpec.org.br/encontro/2022/submissao/files_I/i11-b743dfcc33827840a1e0dccfb6c56908.pdf
Lima, MGB (2022). Just transition towards a bioeconomy: Four dimensions in Brazil, India and Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 136, 102684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102684
Loayza, ACV, Reis, MVS, & Jesus, FR (2024). The formal agribusiness labor market in MATOPIBA during the pandemic period. Journal of Economics and Agribusiness, 22 (2). (No DOI provided). Repository: https://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/79729
Machado, PG, Cunha, M., Walter, A., Faaij, A., & Guilhoto, JJM (2021). Biobased Economy for Brazil: Impacts and strategies for maximizing socioeconomic Benefits. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 139, 110573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110573
Mejias, R.G. (2019). Bioeconomics and its applications. ÎANDÉ: Sciences and Humanities, 2 (3), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.36942/iande.v2i3.87
Moscon, L.M., Costa, K.V. da, Pero, V., & Gesteira, P. (2024). Green jobs in Brazil: Characterization and socioeconomic aspects of the labor market between 2012 and 2022 (Discussion Paper No. 004/2024). Institute of Economics, UFRJ. https://www.ie.ufrj.br/images/IE/TDS/2024/TD_IE_004_2024_MOSCON_COSTA_PERO_SOUZA%20(1).pdf
Muçouçah, P.S. (2009). Green jobs in Brazil: How many are there, where are they and how will they evolve in the coming years. International Labour Organization. https://www.ilo.org/pt-pt/publications/empregos-verdes-no-brasil-quantos-sao-onde-estao-e-como-evoluirao-nos
Oliveira, T.J.A., Ummus, M.E., Muñoz, A.E.P., & Vasco, K.D.L. (2024). A spatial perspective of bioeconomy in the Brazilian Amazon. GEPEC Report, 28 (2), 117–138. https://doi.org/10.48075/igepec.v28i2.33222
Ollinaho, O.I., & Kröger, M. (2023). separating the two faces of “bioeconomy”: Plantation economy and sociobiodiverse economy in Brazil. Forest Policy and Economics, 149, 102932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2023.102932
Pavone, V. (2012). Science, neoliberalism and bioeconomy. Iberoamerican science magazine technology and society, 7(20), 145-161.
Perroux, F. (1977). The concept of development pole. Regional economy: selected texts. Belo Horizonte: CEDEPLAR, 145-156.
Queiroz-Stein, G., Martinelli, F.S., Dietz, T., & Siegel, K.M. (2024). Disputing the bioeconomy-biodiversity nexus in Brazil: Coalitions, discourses and policies. Forest Policy and Economics, 158, 103101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2023.103101
Rodrigues, D.C., Ribeiro, A.S., Silva, J.P.S., & Passador, C.S. (2024). Sociobioeconomy and social technology in the Amazon region: An integrated framework proposition. Journal of Contemporary Administration, 28 (6), e240223. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2024240223.en
Scheiterle, L., Ulmer, A., Birner, R., & Pyka, A. (2018). From commodity- based value chains to biomass-based value webs: The case of sugarcane in Brazil's bioeconomy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3851–3863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.150
Serigati, FC, Possamai, RC, & Diz, LAC (2023). Methodology for generating data on the bioeconomy labor market (OCBio technical report). FGV EESP. https://agro.fgv.br/sites/default/files/2023-06/eesp_relatorio_bioeconomia-ap1_v1.pdf
Souza, MPR, Ruths, JC, & Piffer, M. (2023). Formal labor market in agribusiness segments in the mesoregions of Paraná. Journal of Management and Secretariat, 14 (5), 7404–7428. https://doi.org/10.7769/gesec.v14i5.2129
VERDES, E. (2008). Green Jobs: Decent Work in a Sustainable and Low-Carbon World. United Nations Environment Programme. International Labour Organization. Sep.
Willerding, AL, Silva, LR, Silva, RP, Assis, GMO, & Paula, EVCM (2020). Strategies for the development of the bioeconomy in the state of Amazonas. Advanced Studies, 34 (98), 145–166. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-4014.2020.3498.010
Winkler, H., Di Maro, V., Montoya, K., Olivieri, S., & Vazquez, E. (2024). Measuring green jobs: A new database for Latin America and other regions (Policy Research Working Paper No. 10794). World Bank.
World Bank. (2024). Just transition taxonomy: Narrative report.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 RP3 - Revista de Pesquisa em Políticas Públicas

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Os autores de trabalhos submetidos à revista autorizam sua publicação em meio eletrônico, unicamente para fins acadêmicos, podendo ser reproduzidos desde que citada a fonte. Os mesmos atestam sua originalidade e sua autoria




