Local Neurotechnology Development Proposal: Outcomes of the Integration between Academia and Industry in Biomedical Engineering
Keywords:
Neurotechnology, biomedical engineering, innovationAbstract
Neurotechnology is revolutionizing Biomedical Engineering, especially in brain-computer interfaces (BCI), neuromodulation, and applied artificial intelligence. However, the gap between academia and industry hinders the advancement of effective solutions. To address this, NeuroTechBSB has been proposed—an innovation hub stemming from a partnership between the University of Brasília's Postgraduate Program in Biomedical Engineering (PPGEB-UnB) and NeuroTechX. The NeuroTechBSB aims to integrate students, researchers, and professionals, fostering an ecosystem for technology experimentation and development in Brazil. The initiative seeks to engage academics and the external community interested in neurosciences, promoting practical and collaborative learning. Plans include national and international events, workshops, and projects to boost knowledge production in areas like BCI, neurostimulation, artificial intelligence, machine learning, biomedical data analysis, electronics, and robotics. Beyond developing technological solutions, the hub strives to create innovative educational methodologies, equipping professionals for the job market. The project strengthens the connection between academia and industry, propelling neurotechnology and biomedical engineering in Brazil. Launched in 2023, NeuroTechBSB solidifies a collaborative ecosystem that fosters applied research and prepares professionals for the industrial sector and Brazilian technological advancement. This work presents the results of nearly two years of activities, aiming to encourage similar projects.
References
Lisenmeier, R.A. What makes a biomedical engineer?. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, 2003, 22(4), 32-38. DOI: 10.1109/memb.2003.1237489
arris, T.R.; Bransford, J.D.; Brophy, S.P. Roles for learning sciences and learning technologies in biomedical engineering education: a review of recent advances. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 2002, 4, 29-48. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bioeng.4.091701.125502
Kamel-Alsayed, S.; Loftus, S. Using and Combining Learning Theories in Medical Education. Medical Science Educator, 2018, 28, 255-258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-017-0519-9
Crow, J.; Murray, J.A. Online Distance Learning in Biomedical Sciences: Community, Belonging and Presence. Em Biomedical Visualisation, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology.; Rea, P., vol 1235. Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-37639-0_10
Koroshetz, W.; Ward, J.; Grady, C. NeuroEthics and the BRAIN initiative: Where Are We Going?. AJOB Neuroscience, 2020, 11, 140-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2020.1778119
Morris, K.; Nami, M.; Bolanos, J.F.; Lobo, M.A.; Sadri-Naini, M.; Fiallos, J.; et al.. Neuroscience20 (BRAIN20, SPINE20, and MENTAL20) Health Initiative: A Global Consortium Addressing the Human and Economic Burden of Brain, Spine, and Mental Disorders Through Neurotech Innovations and Policies. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 2021, 83(4), 1563-1601. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-215190
Brasil. (2022). Projeto de Lei nº 522/2022. Senado Federal. https://www.camara.leg.br/proposicoesWeb/fichadetramitacao?idProposicao=2317524
Bublitz, J. C. (2022). Novel Neurotechnologies and Human Rights. Neuroethics, 15(2), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-021-09487-2
Ienca, M., & Andorno, R. (2017). Towards new human rights in the age of neuroscience and neurotechnology. Life Sciences, Society and Policy, 13, 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-017-0050-1
Koroshetz, W. J., et al. (2020). The BRAIN Initiative 2.0: From Cells to Circuits, Toward Cures. Neuron, 106(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2020.03.017
Liu, N. K., Zhang, W., & Lin, M. (2022). Ethical risks in consumer neurotechnology: A market analysis. Nature Machine Intelligence, 4(1), 12–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-021-00422-5
Mak, J. N., & Wolpaw, J. R. (2009). Clinical applications of brain-computer interfaces: current state and future prospects. IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 2, 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1109/RBME.2009.2035356
UNESCO. (2021). Ethics of Artificial Intelligence: Recommendation adopted at the 41st session of the General Conference. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137
UNESCO. (2023). Towards an International Recommendation on the Ethics of Neurotechnology. Paris. https://www.unesco.org/en/ethics-neurotech/recommendation
Wagner, F. B., et al. (2018). Targeted neurotechnology restores walking in humans with spinal cord injury. Nature, 563(7729), 65–71. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0649-2
Wolpaw, J. R., & Wolpaw, E. W. (Eds.). (2012). Brain-Computer Interfaces: Principles and Practice. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388855.001.0001
Zeng, F. G., et al. (2008). Cochlear implants: system design, integration, and evaluation. IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 1, 115–142. https://doi.org/10.1109/RBME.2008.2008250
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Interdisciplinar de Pesquisa em Engenharia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Given the public access policy of the journal, the use of the published texts is free, with the obligation of recognizing the original authorship and the first publication in this journal. The authors of the published contributions are entirely and exclusively responsible for their contents.
1. The authors authorize the publication of the article in this journal.
2. The authors guarantee that the contribution is original, and take full responsibility for its content in case of impugnation by third parties.
3. The authors guarantee that the contribution is not under evaluation in another journal.
4. The authors keep the copyright and convey to the journal the right of first publication, the work being licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License-BY.
5. The authors are allowed and stimulated to publicize and distribute their work on-line after the publication in the journal.
6. The authors of the approved works authorize the journal to distribute their content, after publication, for reproduction in content indexes, virtual libraries and similars.
7. The editors reserve the right to make adjustments to the text and to adequate the article to the editorial rules of the journal.
