Custos e Benefícios de Recordar em Colaboração:
Breve Revisão da Literatura
Palabras clave:
Psicologia da Memória, Memória, Interferência, Retenção, Memória colaborativa, Inibição colaborativaResumen
Após anos de pesquisa sobre o funcionamento da memória humana como um processo de armazenamento e recordação individual de informação, surgem cada vez mais estudos focados na compreensão da memória como um processo também vivido em grupo: a memória colaborativa. Nesse sentido, o presente artigo pretendeu, através de uma revisão da literatura, sintetizar algumas das questões mais relevantes do estudo da memória colaborativa. Para tal, apresentamos o paradigma experimental mais usado nesse tipo de estudos, bem como os custos e benefícios que resultam da partilha e recordação de informação em grupo. A redação deste artigo permitiu-nos concluir que, apesar do número crescente de estudos nessa área, ainda existem algumas lacunas, nomeadamente no que se refere à produção de falsas memórias, bem como acerca da real implicação prática do uso de diferentes tarefas de memória.
Referencias
Andersson, J. (2001). Net effect of memory collaboration: How is
collaboration affected by factors such as friendship, gender
and age?. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 42, 367-375.
doi: 10.1111/1467-9450.00248
Andersson, J., & Ronnerberg, J. (1996). Collaboration and memory:
Effects of dyadic retrieval on different memory tasks. Applied
Cognitive Psychology, 10, 171-181.
doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199604)10:2<171::AIDACP385>
0.CO;2-D
Andersson, J., & Rönnerberg, J. (1997). Cued memory collaboration:
Effects of friendship and type of retrieval cue. European Journal
of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 273-287. doi:10.1080/713752558
Barber, S. (2010). Collaborative memory and part-set cuing
impairments: The role of executive control (Doctoral
dissertation), Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New
York, USA.
Barber, S., Harris, C., & Rajaram, S. (2014). Why two heads apart
are better than two heads together: Multiple mechanisms
underlie the collaborative inhibition effect in memory.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 41, 559-566. doi:10.1037/xlm0000037.
Barber, S., Rajaram, S., & Aron, A. (2010). When two is too many:
Collaborative encoding impairs memory. Memory & Cognition,
, 255-264. doi:10.3758/MC.38.3.255
Barnier, A., Sutton, J., Harris, C., & Wilson, R. (2008). A conceptual
and empirical framework for the social distribution of
cognition: The case of memory. Cognitive Systems Research,
, 33-51. doi: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2007.07.002
Basden, B., Basden, D., & Henry, S. (2000). Costs and benefits of
collaborative remembering. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14,
-507. doi: 10.1002/1099-0720(200011/12)14:6<497::AIDACP665>
0.CO;2-4
Basden, B., Basden, D., & Stephens, J. (2002). Part-set cuing
of order information in recall tests. Journal of Memory and
Language, 47, 517-529. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00016-5
Basden, B., Basden, D., Bryner, S., & Thomas III, R. (1997).
A comparison of group and individual remembering:
Does collaboration disrupt retrieval strategies?. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,
, 1176-1189. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.23.5.1176
Basden, B., Basden, D., Thomas III, R., & Souphasith, S. (1998).
Memory distortion in group recall. Current Psychology:
Developmental, Learning, Personality, Social, 16, 225-246.
doi: 10.1007/s12144-997-1001-4
Blumen, H., & Rajaram, S. (2008). Influence of re-exposure
and retrieval disruption during group collaboration
on later individual recall. Memory, 16, 231-244. doi:
1080/09658210701804495
Blumen, H., Rajaram, S., & Henkel, l. (2013). The applied value
of collaborative memory research in aging: Behavioral and
neural considerations. Journal of Applied Research in Memory
and Cognition, 2, 107-117. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.03.003
Clark, S., Hori, A., Putnam, A., & Martin, T. (2000). Group
collaboration in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1578-1588.
doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.6.1578
Congleton, A., & Rajaram, S. (2011). The Influence of Learning
Methods on Collaboration: Prior Repeated Retrieval Enhances
Retrieval Organization, Abolishes Collaborative Inhibition, and
Promotes Post-Collaborative Memory. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: General, 140, 535-551. doi:10.1037/a0024308
Dahlström, Ö., Danielsson, H., Emilsson, M., & Andersson, J.
(2011). Does retrieval strategy disruption cause general and
specific collaborative inhibition?. Memory, 19, 140-154. doi:
1080/09658211.2010.539571
Ebbinghaus, H. (1885). Memory: A contributions to experimental
psychology. New York City, U.S.A.: Teachers College,
Columbia University.
Finlay, F., Hitch, G., & Meudell, P. (2000). Mutual inhibition in
collaborative recall: Evidence for a retrieval-based account.
Journal of Experimental Psychology, 26, 1556-1567. doi:
1037//0278-7393.26.6.1556
Garrido, M. (2012). Paradigma subjacente ao estudo do efeito de
inibição colaborativa. Laboratório de Psicologia, 10, 251-264.
doi: 10.14417/lp.674
Gould, O., Osborn, C., Krein, H., & Mortenson, M. (2002).
Collaborative recall in married and unacquainted dyads.
International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 36-44.
doi: 10.1080/01650250143000292
Harris, C., Barnier, A., & Sutton, J. (2012). Consensus collaboration
enhances group and individual recall accuracy. The Quarterly
Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 179-194. doi:
1080/17470218.2011.608590
Henkel, L., & Rajaram, S. (2011). Collaborative remembering
in older adults: Age-invariant outcomes in the context of
episodic recall deficits. Psychology and Aging, 26, 532-545.
doi: 10.1037/a0023106
Hirst, W., & Manier, D. (2008). Towards a psychology of
collective memory. Memory, 16, 183-200. doi:
1080/09658210701811912
Howe, C., Tolmie, A., Rodgers, C. (1992). The acquisition of
conceptual knowledge in science by primary-school children
”“ group-interaction and the understanding of motion down
an incline. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10,
-130. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.1992.tb00566.x
Johansson, N., Andersson, J., & Rönnberg, J. (2000). Do
elderly couples have a better prospective memory than
other elderly people when they collaborate?. Applied
Cognitive Psychology, 14, 121-133. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-
(200003/04)14:2<121::AID-ACP626>3.3.CO;2-1
Johansson, N., Andersson, J., & Rönnberg, J. (2005). Compensating
strategies in collaborative remembering in very old couples.
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46, 349-359.
Kelley, M., Reysen, M., Ahlstrand, K., & Pentz, C. (2012).
Collaboration inhibition persists following social processing.
Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24, 727-734. doi:
1080/20445911.2012.684945
Latané, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make
light work: The causes and consequences of social loafing.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822-832.
doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.822
Leman, P., & Oldham, Z. (2005). Do children need to learn
to collaborate? The effect of age and age differences on
collaborative recall. Cognitive Development, 20, 33-48. doi:
1016/j.cogdev.2004.07.002
Maki, R., Weigold, A., & Arrelano, A. (2008). False memory for
associated word lists in individuals and collaborating groups.
Memory & Cognition, 36, 598-603. doi: 10.3758/MC.36.3.598
Meade, M., & Roediger, H. (2009). Age differences in collaborative
memory: The role of retrieval manipulations. Memory &
Cognition, 37, 962-975. doi:10.3758/MC.37.7.962
Meade, M., Nokes, T., & Morrow, D. (2009). Expertise promotes
facilitation on a collaborative memory task. Memory, 17, 39-
doi: 10.1080/09658210802524240
Olick, J., (1999). Collective Memory: The Two Cultures.
Sociological Theory, 17, 333-348. doi: 10.1111/0735-
00083
Paulo, R., Albuquerque, P. B, & Bull, R. (2013). The enhanced
cognitive interview: towards a better use and understanding
of this procedure. International Journal of Police Science &
Management, 15, 190-199. doi: 10.1350/ijps.2013.15.3.311
Rajaram, S., & Pereira-Pasarin, P. (2010). Collaborative memory:
Cognitive research and theory. Perspectives on Psychological
Science, 5, 649-663. doi:10.1177/1745691610388763
Roediger, H., Meade, M., & Bergman, E. (2001). Social contagion
of memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 365-371. doi:
3758/BF03196174
Ross, M., Spencer, S., Linardatos, L., Lam, K., & Perunovic, M.
(2004). Going shopping and identifying landmarks: Does
collaboration improve older people’s memory?. Applied
Cognitive Psychology, 18, 683-696. doi: 10.1002/acp.1023
Saraiva, M., Albuquerque, P., & Arantes, J. (2015a). Production of
false memories in collaborative memory tasksusing the DRM
paradigm. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Saraiva, M., Albuquerque, P., & Arantes, J. (2015b).What happens
to the collaborative inhibition effect when participants share
the same retrieval strategy? A study with method of loci.
Manuscript submitted for publication.
Slamecka, N. (1968). An examination of trace storage in free
recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 504-513. doi:
1037/h0025695
Takahashi, M., & Saito, S. (2004). Does test delay eliminate
collaborative inhibition?. Memory, 12, 722-731. doi:
1080/09658210344000521
Thorley, C., & Dewhurst, S. (2007). Collaborative false recall in
the DRM procedure: Effects of group size and group pressure.
European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 867-881. doi:
1080/09541440600872068
Tulving, E. (1985). How many memory systems are there? American
Psychologist, 40, 385-398. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.40.4.385
Weldon, M., & Bellinger, K., (1997). Collective memory: The nature
of individual and collaborative recall. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1160-1175.
doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.23.5.1160
Weldon, M., Blair, C., & Huebsch, P. (2000). Group remembering:
Does social loafing underlie collaborative inhibition?.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 26, 1568-1577. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.26.6.1568
Yaron-Antar, A., & Nachson, I. (2006). Collaborative remembering
of emotional events: The case of Rabin’s assassination.
Memory, 14, 46-56. doi:10.1080/09658210444000502
