Bioethics: academic speciality or social movement

Authors

  • Miguel Kottow Universidad de Chile

Keywords:

Bioethics. Social commitment. Applied ethics. Empowerment. Becoming vulnerable.

Abstract

As a form of applied ethics, bioethics is strongly rooted in theory provided both by philosophy and by the social practices that are of its concern. These foundations need to be the basis leading to recommendations for social routines, with the aim of achieving a democratic interplay of civic forces and fortification of the social institutions that empower the deprived, provide care for people who have become vulnerable and protect citizenship. It is unnecessary to persist in identifying a rigorous definition for bioethics or to adhere to the rigor of one method or the rigidity of one angle of epistemology, given that the aim of bioethics is not cognitive but rather prescriptive, and the standards should remain open to communicative argument. The nations of Latin America and the Caribbean are faced with a bioethical strategy coming from the more developed world, which is not only polemical but also overtly conflictive. Thus, it becomes essential for the region to develop its own type of vigorous and coherent bioethical discourse that is robust in its theory and directed towards local social problems and the defense of vulnerable populations that are being neglected and are losing out in their sanitary, pharmaceutical and research needs. For this reason, bioethics needs to become increasingly participative in social processes and to argue strongly not only against practices that leave people vulnerable, but also in favor of the development of social practices and institutions of therapeutic and protective nature.

Author Biography

  • Miguel Kottow, Universidad de Chile

    Escuela de Salud Pública, Facultad de Medicina, Santiago, Chile.

References

Reich WT. The word “bioethics”: The struggle over its earliest meanings. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1995; 5: 19-34.

Apel K-O. Teoría de la verdad y ética del discurso. Barcelona: Paidós 1995.

Fins J. Bacchetta MD, Miller FG. Clinical pragmatism: A method of moral problem solving. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1997; 7: 129-46.

Garrafa V. Multi-inter-transdisciplinariedad, complejidad y totalidad concreta en bioética. In: Garrafa V, Kottow M, Saada A. Estatuto epistemológico de la bioética. México, UNAM/UNESCO 2005: 67-93.

Gracia GD. El qué y el porqué de la bioética. Cuadernos del Programa Regional de Bioética 1995; 1: 35-53.

Kottow M. Introducción a la bioética. 2a ed. Santiago: Editorial Mediterráneo 2005.

Beauchamp TL The nature of applied ethics. In: Frey RG, Wellman CH. (eds.): A companion to applied ethics. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003. p. 1-16.

Hottois G., Missa J-N. Nouvelle encyclopédie de bioéthique. Bruxelle: De Boeck & Larcier, 2001.

Giannini H. Breve historia de la filosofía. 7a. ed. Santiago: Ed.Universitaria, 1988.

Gracia GD. Op. cit: 37.

Maliandi R. Ética: conceptos y problemas. Buenos Aires: Editorial Biblos, 1991.

Kottow M. Tensiones retóricas y semánticas en ética de la investigación. Cadernos da Saúde Pública: 2007; 23:2396-402.

Agamben G. Homo sacer. Valencia: Pre-Textos 2003.

Beauchamp TL. Op. cit.: 10-12.

Gracia D. Fundamentos de bioética. Madrid: EUDEMA, 1989.

Kuczewski M. Casuistry and principlism: the convergence of method in biomedical ethics.Theoretical ethics and bioethics. 1998; 19: 509-24.

Feyerabend P. Against method. London, Verso 1975.

Kottow M. Bioética prescriptiva. La falacia naturalista. El concepto de principios en bioética. En Garrafa V., Kottow M. & Saada A. Estatuto epistemológico de la bioética. México, Unam/Unesco 2005:1-28.

Maliandi R. Cultura y conflicto. Buenos Aires: Editorial Biblos, 1984.

Žižeck S. Violencia en acto. Buenos Aires: Paidós, 2004.

Knight K. Aristotelian philosophy. Cambridge UK: Polity Press, 2007. p.173.

MacIntyre A. Review of Raymond Geuss, Outside Ethics.http://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews.cfm?id=5922 (accesado 25.04.07).

Muzzopappa H. El concepto de “sociedad civil” como fundamento de la filosofía aplicada. In: Fernández G. (comp.): El giro aplicado. Buenos Aires: UNLa, 2002. p. 129-52.

Cohen JL Arato A. Sociedad civil y teoría política. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2002. p.556.

__________Op. cit. p. 589.

Issue

Section

Artigos de Atualização

How to Cite

Bioethics: academic speciality or social movement. (2007). Revista Brasileira De Bioética, 3(3), 328-343. https://periodicostestes.bce.unb.br/index.php/rbb/article/view/7946

Most read articles by the same author(s)