Compulsory hospitalization of crack users in Brazil: pros and cons

Abstract

This study evaluated the advantages and disadvantages of compulsory hospitalization of crack users in Brazil through the opinions of managers, media and politicians involved in the debate. This is an argumentative work. A literature review considering favorable and unfavorable arguments and individual and social impact was held. The main arguments against compulsory hospitalization are related to disregarding patient autonomy, financial interests and hygienist policies; favorable arguments include the health regain of the dependent, and the protection of the person, his family and the society against damages resulting from the drug use. The compulsory hospitalization, in some cases, aims to protect, as it is indicated when the individual poses risks to himself and others; however, the health care is able to provide appropriate treatment through outpatient services, which have the structure to treat addiction without depriving the liberty of the patient.