Um percurso
o caso “por qué no te callas?”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35956/v.8.n1.2008.p.109-117Keywords:
discoursive formation. positioning. course. why don Ìt you shup up?Abstract
This article presents some concepts proposed by Maingueneau (2006), with emphasis on that of the course, and analyzes the event why don´t you shut up? especially that which refers to its circulation and interpretation. As to the second aspect, two facts stand out: that which was appropriate for both followers of the same point of view (positioning?), starting from that which was originally proferred, and their adversaries; and that which was uttered also without political conotations to attempt to quiet one who speaks too much or out of context.
References
MAINGUENEAU, D. & GRÉSILLON, A. (1984). ‘Polyphonie, proverbe et détourne-ment’, Langages, 73: 112-125. Paris: Didier-Larousse.
MAINGUENEAU, D. (2006). ‘Unidades tópicas e não-tópicas’,in: D. Maingue-neau, Cenas da enunciação, pp.9-24. Curitiba: Criar Edições.
MIQUELETTI, F. (2008). ‘A emoção nos discursos contemporâneos sobre política’,Comunicação apresentada no 56º Seminário do Gel.
PÊCHEUX, M. & FUCHS, C. ([1975]1990). ‘A propósito da análise automática dodiscurso: atualização e perspectivas’, in: F. Gadet & T. Hak (orgs) Por uma análise automática do discurso; uma introdução à obra de Michel Pêcheux, pp. 163-252. Campinas: Editora da Unicamp.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors retain the copyright and guarantee RALED the right to be the first publication of the work as well as a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with recognition of authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
