Revisionism and negationism
controversies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26512/rhh.v9i17.36429Keywords:
revisionismo; negacionismo; Holocausto; historiografia;Abstract
Although revisionism and negationism are terms and concepts that allude to different things, they are often confused in studies on different themes and situations. This article seeks to differentiate them and to analyze the reasons and the processes from which the two terms were often confused. The issue gained particular visibility in the controversies surrounding Nazi crimes in World War II, but it involves controversies before and after the conflict. Such a reality can be observed in three dimensions that, being autonomous, not infrequently got mixed up: (a) political and ideological; (b) historiographic; (c) judicial. Involving disputes from the past, the interpenetration of these dimensions occurs, above all, when issues of the history of the Present Time are at stake.
References
ARENDT, Hannah. Origens do totalitarismo: o anti-semitismo, instrumento de poder. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Documentário, 1975.
ARENDT, Hannah. On Revolution. New York, The Viking Press, 1963.
BÉDARIDA, François. “L’histoire de la Résistance: lectures d’hier, chantiers de demain.” Vingtième Siècle, Paris, n. 11, jul-set, 1986.
BERSTEIN, Edward. Evolutionary socialism: a criticism and affirmation. New York, B.W. Huebsch, 1909.
BERSTEIN, Edward. Socialismo evolucionário. Rio de Janeiro, Zahar, 1964.
BLOCH, Marc. Apologia da História ou o ofício do historiador. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar, 2002.
Cambridge Dicitionary. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/ism.
CHIRAC, Jacques. Discurso do presidente da República, na comemoração da grande razia do Vel’d’Hiv, de 16 e 17 de julho de 1942. Paris, 16/071995. www.sunderland.ac.uk/~os0tmc/occupied/chirac.htm Last Update 16-Oct-00. Acesso em 08/02/2007.
COBBAN, Alfred. The myth of the French Revolution. London, University College, 1955, 25 pp.
Counter Extremism Project. Jobbik. https://www.counterextremism.com/threat/jobbik. Acesso realizado em 25/01/2020.
DELY, Renaud et VIROT, Pascal. “La lente insinuation des révisionnistes”. Libération. 21/08/1996. https://www.liberation.fr/societe/1996/08/21/la-lente-insinuation-des-revisionnistes-quand-l-ultragauche-remet-en-cause-la-realite-du-genocide-ju_179222. Acesso realizado em 29/03/2020.
Deutsche Welle (DW), 01/02/2018 e 27/07/2018.
DROIT, Emmanuel. “Le Goulag contre la Shoah. Mémoires officielles et cultures mémorielles dans l'Europe élargie”. Vingtième Siècle. Revue d'histoire. 2007/2, nº 94.
DUCLERT, Vincent. “Le Panthéon, un double enjeu”. Libération. Paris, 19/01/2007.
ERÅSS Ágnes. “‘In memory of victims’: Monument and counter-monument in Liberty Square, Budapest”. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 65(3), 2016, pp. 237-254.
European Union. The history of the European Union. https://europa.eu/european-union/about-eu/history_en. Acesso realizado em 28/01/2020.
FIGES, Orlando. A People’s Tragedy: a History of the Russian Revolution. Londres: Jonathan Cape, 1996.
FISHMAN, Sarah; DOWNS, Laura Lee; SINANOGLOU, Ioannis; SMITH, Leonard V. e ZARETSKY, Robert (orgs.). La France sous Vichy: autour de Robert O. Paxton. Paris: IHTP/CNRS; Bruxelas: Editions Complexe, 2004.
FITZPATRICK, Sheila. Cultural Revolution in Russia. Bloomington, 1978.
FLORENZANO, Modesto. “François Furet, historiador da Revolução Francesa”. Revista de História. São Paulo, USP. 1o semestre de 1995.
FURET, François e RICHET, Denis. La Révolution Française. 2 vols. Paris, Hachette, 1965-1966.
FURET, François. Le catéchisme révolutionnaire”. Annales. Economies, sociétés, civilisations. 26ᵉ année, N. 2, 1971. pp. 255- 289.
FURET, François. Penser la Révolution Française. Paris, Gallimard, 1978.
GELLATELY, Robert (org.). Entrevistas de Nuremberga. Conduzidas por Leon Goldensohn. Lisboa, Tinta-da-China, 2006.
GERARD, Alice. “La crise révisionniste de l'historiographie révolutionnaire et le bicentenaire”. Dans: AMALVI, Christian (dir.). Une passion de l'histoire: histoire(s) mémoire(s) et Europe: hommage au professeur Charles-Olivier Carbonell. Toulouse, Privât, 2002.
GINZBURG, Carlo. El juez y el historiador. Consideraciones al margen del processo Sofri. Madrid, Anaya & Mario Muchnik, 1993.
GODECHOT, Jacques. “As grandes correntes da historiografia da Revolução Francesa, de 1789 aos nossos dias”. Revista de História (USP), 1969, vol. 39, n. 80. p. 423-470.
Holocaust Remembrance Project. Disponível em: https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/c1aa54_d6fdacf05b6845a3a2cacbf80ed6720c.pdf. Acesso realizado em 01/02/2020.
JOUTARD, Philippe. “Préface”. GUILLON, Jean-Marie e LABORIE, Pierre (dirs.). Mémoire et Histoire. La Résistance. Toulouse, Privat, 1995.
KERTÉSZ, Imre. A língua exilada. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2002.
LABORIE, Pierre. Le chagrin et le venin. La France sous l’Occupation, mémoire et idées recues. Montrouge: Bayard, 2011.
LABORIE, Pierre. “Négationnisme”. In: __________. Les mots de 39-45. Toulouse: Presses Universitaires du Mirail, 2006.
LABORIE, Pierre. “L’idée de Résistance, entre définition et sens: retour sur un questionnement.” In: LABORIE, Pierre. Les Français des années troubles. De la guerre d' Espagne à la Liberation. Paris: Seuil, 2003 (artigo foi publicado originalmente em 1998, em Cahiers de l’IHTP, número especial, dez. de 1997).
Le Figaro. “Les chambres à gaz, «détail de l'Histoire» : Jean-Marie Le Pen définitivement condamné”. 27/03/2018. https://www.lefigaro.fr/politique/le-scan/2018/03/27/25001-20180327ARTFIG00191-les-chambres-a-gaz-detail-de-l-histoire-jean-marie-le-pen-definitivement-condamne.php. Acesso realizado em 27/01/2020.
Le Monde. “Une lettre de M. Faurisson”, 16/01/1979. https://www.lemonde.fr/archives/article/1979/01/16/une-lettre-de-m-faurisson_2788214_1819218.html. Acesso realizado em 29/03/2020.
Le Parisien. http://dictionnaire.sensagent.leparisien.fr/Fidesz-Union%20civique%20hongroise/fr-fr/. Acesso em 27/01/2020.
LIEBEL, Vinicius. “O Populismo de Direita e suas Estratégias de Sobrevivência - o Alternative fur Deutschland (AfD)”. In: ANDRADE, Guilherme Inácio de Franco; BARBOSA, Jefferson Rodrigues; RIBEIRO, Marcus Vinicius; GONÇALVES, Rodrigo Jurecê Mattos. (Org.). Tempos Conservadores: Estudos Críticos sobre as Direitas - As Direitas na Europa. 1ed.Goiânia: Gárgula, 2020, v. 3, p. 105-133.
LIPSTADT, Deborah E. Denying the Holocaust. The Growing Assault on Truth and Memory. Plume, 1994.
LOUVRIER, Julien. “Penser la controverse: la réception du livre de François Furet et Denis Richet, La Révolution française”. Annales historiques de la Révolution française, n°351, 2008. pp. 151-176.
MATHIEZ, Albert. La Révolution Française. Paris, Armand Colin, (1a ed.), 1922.
MORAES, Luís Edmundo. “Negacionismo: a extrema-direita e a negação da política de extermínio nazista”. In: SCHURSTER, Karl; LAPSKY, Igor; SILVA, Francisco Carlos Teixeira; SILVA, Giselda Brito. Velhas e Novas Direitas: a atualidade de uma polêmica. Recife: EDUPE, 2014.
PERCHOC, Philippe. “Un passé, deux assemblées. L’Assemblée Parlementaire du Conseil de l’Europe, le Parlement Européen et l’interprétation de l’histoire (2004-2009)”. In: Revue d’études comparatives Est-Ouest, 2014/3 (N° 45), p. 205-235. DOI: 10.4074/S0338059914003088. URL: https://www.cairn.info/revue-revue-d-etudes-comparatives-est-ouest1-2014-3-page-205.htm
PERETZ, Pauline. “La Grande Famine ukrainienne de 1932-1933: essai d'interprétation”. In: Revue d’études comparatives Est-Ouest, vol. 30, 1999, n°1. Dossier: "Retours sur le passé" pp. 31-52.
ROLLEMBERG, Denise. Resistência. Memória da ocupação nazista na França e na Itália. São Paulo, Alameda, 2016.
ROSANVALLON, Pierre. Le siècle du populisme. Histoire, théorie, critique. Paris: Seuil, 2020.
ROUSSO, Henry. “Les racines du négationnisme en France”. Cités, 2008/4 (n° 36), p. 51-62.
ROUSSO, Henry. La hantise du passé. Entretien avec Philippe Petit. Paris: Les Éditions Textuel, 1998.
ROUSSO, Henry. Syndrome de Vichy. De 1944 Ã nos jours. 2ème éd. Paris, Éditions du Seuil, 1990 (1a ed. 1987).
SEGRILLO, Angelo. “Historiografia da Revolução Russa: antigas e novas abordagens”. Projeto História (PUCSP), v. 41, p. 63-92, 2010.
SÉMELIN, Jacques. “Qu’est-ce que ‘résistir’?”. Esprit, Paris, n. 198, jan. 1994.
SHAFIR, Michael. Between Denial and "Comparative Trivialization": Holocaust Negationism in Post-Communist East Central Europe. Jerusalem: Vidal Sassoon International Center for the Study of Antisemitism, ACTA, No. 19, 2002, 84 pp.
SOBOUL, Albert. La Révolution française, 1789-1799, Éditions Sociales, 1948.
SOBOUL, Albert. “L’historiographie classique de la Révolution française. Sur des controversies récente”. La Pensée, 1974.
SUNY, Ronald G. “Revision and Retreat in the Historiography of 1917: Social History and its critics”. In: The Russian Review, Vol. 53, No. 2 (April, 1994), p. 165. Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/130821. Accessed: 09-02-2020 17:12 UTC.
THÉNARD, Jean-Michel. “Vérité”. Editorial. Libération. Paris, 19 de janeiro de 2007.
TODOROV, Tzvetan. Les abus de la Mémoire. Paris: Arléa, 2004.
TRAVERSO, Enzo. La historia como campo de batalla. Interpretar las violencias del siglo XX. Buenos Aires, Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2016.
TROPER, Michel. “La loi Gayssot et la Constitution”. Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales. 54ᵉ année, N. 6, 1999. pp. 1239- 1255.
VIDAL-NAQUET, Pierre. “Thèses sur le “révisionnisme” (1985). Les assassins de la mémoire. “Un Eichmann de papier” et autres essais sur le révisionnisme, sous la direction de Vidal-Naquet Pierre. Paris, La Découverte, Poche / Essais, 2005.
WIDER Thomas. « On voit et on entend des choses qu’on n’aurait jamais imaginées avant »: en Allemagne, la mémoire des camps malmenée. Le Monde, 27/01/2020.
WIEVIORKA, Michel. Le Front national entre extrémisme, populisme et démocratie. Paris: Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de l’homme, 2013.
WIEVIORKA Olivier. La mémoire désunie. Le souvenir politique des années sombres, de la Libération à nos jours. Paris, Seuil, 2010.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 História, histórias
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
