The technological revolution as the tragedy of knowledge?
AI, the illusion of sentience, and machinic subjectivation in the age of ChatGPT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26512/rfmc.v13i2.55497Keywords:
ChatGPT. Artificial intelligence. Sentience. Technical rationality. Anthropomorphization.Abstract
This article aims to discuss how the illusion of sentience and technological reification reflect a condition of domination and control in the digital age. The misconception of machine consciousness — sentience — has functioned as a form of affirmative representation by users, particularly among some programmers and technologists. This mode of subjectivation testifies to the phantasmagoria of modernity in its absolute myth, fostered by uninterrupted exposure to digital technologies. The anthropomorphization of technology is interpreted as an attempt to render the unknown more familiar, manageable, and less complex. Through the imitative function of human traits, data analysis, and the objectification of targets with high precision and speed, artificial intelligence becomes humanized. New AI technologies, such as ChatGPT, not only reshape interaction and information processing but also transform human communication and autonomy. As a modality of instrumental reason, AI operates as a necropolitical tool of control through statistical collection and algorithmic analysis, enabling sophisticated mechanisms of surveillance and identification.
References
ADORNO, Theodor; HORKHEIMER, Max. Dialética do Esclarecimento: fragmentos filosóficos. Trad. Guido Antônio de Almeida. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar Editor, 1985.
ADORNO, Theodor. Dialética negativa. Trad. Marco Antonio Casanova. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 2009.
BARSALOU, Lawrence. Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, v. 22, p. 577-660, 1999.
BAUMAN, Zygmunt. Modernidade líquida. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar, 2001.
BENJAMIN, Walter. Passagens. Belo Horizonte: UFMG; São Paulo: Imprensa Oficial do Estado de São Paulo, 2006.
CLARK, Andy. Being there: putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.
CHOMSKY, Noam. Noam Chomsky and GPT-3: Are large language models a good model of human language? 2022. Disponível em: https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/noam-chomsky-and-gpt-3. Acesso em: 18 maio 2023.
FEENBERG, Andrew. Critical theory of technology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.
FEENBERG, Andrew. Questioning technology. 3. ed. London; New York: Routledge, 1999.
FEENBERG, Andrew. Transforming technology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
FEENBERG, Andrew. Democratic rationalization: technology, power, and freedom. In: SCHARFF, Robert; DUSEK, Val (eds.). Philosophy of technology. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2003. p. 652-665.
FLORIDI, Luciano. The philosophy of information. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
FLORIDI, Luciano. What the near future of artificial intelligence could be. Philosophy & Technology, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-019-00345-y. Acesso em: 25 abr. 2025.
FLUSSER, Vilém. Filosofia da caixa preta: ensaios para uma futura filosofia da fotografia. São Paulo: Annablume, 2011.
FOUCAULT, Michel. Vigiar e punir: nascimento da prisão. Trad. Raquel Ramalhete. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1999.
HEIDEGGER, Martin. Die Frage nach der Technik [A questão da técnica]. Trad. Marco Aurélio Werle. Scientiae Studia, v. 5, n. 3, p. 375–398, 2007.
HUTCHINS, Edwin. Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.
LAKOFF, George; JOHNSON, Mark. Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books, 1999.
LEMOINE, Blake. Is LaMDA Sentient? — an interview. Disponível em: https://cajundiscordian.medium.com/is-lamda-sentient-an-interview-ea64d916d917. Acesso em: 10 nov. 2023.
LIPOVETSKY, Gilles; CHARLES, Sébastien. Os tempos hipermodernos. Trad. Mário Vilela. São Paulo: Barcarolla, 2004.
MARCUSE, Herbert. A ideologia da sociedade industrial: o homem unidimensional. Trad. Giasone Rebuá. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 1982.
MARCUSE, Herbert. Tecnologia, guerra e fascismo. Trad. Maria Cristina Vidal Barbosa. São Paulo: Unesp, 1999.
MARX, Karl. O capital. Trad. Rubens Enderle. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2011.
MBEMBE, Achille. Necropolítica. São Paulo: n-1 edições, 2018.
RODRIGUES, Marcelo; STEFANUTO, Jéssica. Subjetividades, dados e alvos direcionados: o que resta à psicologia? Revista Poiesis, v. 29, n. 2, 2024. DOI: 10.46551/2448-30952024v29n211. Disponível em: https://www.periodicos.unimontes.br/index.php/poiesis/article/view/8472. Acesso em: 3 maio 2025.
ROSA, Hartmut. Aliénation et accélération: vers une théorie critique de la modernité tardive. Trad. Thomas Chaumont. [S.l.]: Nordic Summer University Press, 2010.
ROOSE, Kevin. A conversation with Bing’s chatbot left me deeply unsettled. The New York Times, 2023. Disponível em: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/16/technology/bing-chatbot-microsoft-chatgpt.html. Acesso em: 10 nov. 2023.
ROOSE, Kevin. Bing’s A.I. chat: “I want to be alive.” The New York Times, 2023. Disponível em: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/16/technology/bing-chatbot-transcript.html. Acesso em: 10 nov. 2023.
SEARLE, J. R. What is an intentional state? Mind, v. 88, n. 349, p. 74–92, 1979.
TÜRCKE, Christoph. Sociedade excitada: filosofia da sensação. Trad. Antonio A. S. Zuin. Campinas: Unicamp, 2010.
VAN WOUDENBERG, R.; RANALLI, C.; BRACKER, D. Authorship and ChatGPT: a conservative view. Philosophy & Technology, v. 37, n. 34, 2024.
WILSON, S. RE: Second Request for Reconsideration for Refusal to Register Théâtre d’Opéra Spatial. 5 sep. 2023. Disponível em: https://www.copyright.gov/rulings-filings/review-board/docs/Theatre-Dopera-Spatial.pdf. Acesso em: mar. 2025.
WOOLDRIDGE, M. Intelligent agents. In: WEISS, Gerhard (ed.). Multiagent systems: a modern approach to distributed artificial intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000a.
WOOLDRIDGE, M. Reasoning about rational agents. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000b.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Modern and Contemporary Philosophy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings.
