Understanding and Involvement with Art from the Second-Person Perspective

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26512/rfmc.v9i1.41039

Keywords:

Empathy. Simulation. Postcognitivism. Social Cognition. Expression.

Abstract

This paper shows that the second-person perspective of mental attribution (Pérez 2013 and Pérez and Gomila 2021) can contribute to illuminate our understanding and involvement with art. A canonical way of understanding our involvement with art focuses on the notion of empathy, which is also considered a central notion to account for our access to other minds. In the first part of this paper, I briefly review this notion and I connect it with recent works in the field of philosophy of art in which a simulationist theory is adopted, both to account for our understanding of other people’s minds and for understanding aesthetic experiences. Secondly, I show the limitations that these notions (empathy and simulation) have to account for our understanding and involvement both with other human beings and with art and I briefly expose the central thesis of the second person perspective of psychological attribution. Finally, I show why the second-person perspective is more adequate to account for the many and multifaceted experiences that arise with art and artistic activities.

Author Biography

  • Diana I. Pérez, Universidad de Buenos Aires

    Profesora Titular. Departamento de Filosofía. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras de la Universidad de Buenos Aires. Investigadora Principal IIF-SADAF-CONICET.

References

BRINCK, I. y REDDY, V. (2020) “Dialogue in the making: emotional engagement with materials”. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Science. 19: 23-45.

COPLAN, A. y GOLDIE, P. (2011)Empathy. Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives. OUP.

CURRIE, G. (1995) “Imagination as simulation: Aesthetics meets cognitive science”. In DAVIES, Martin STONE, Tony (eds.), Mental Simulation. Blackwell (1995).

CURRIE, G. RAVENSCROFT, I. (2002)Recreative Minds: Imagination in Philosophy and Psychology. OUP.

DE JAEGHER, H. DI PAOLO, E. (2007) “Participatory sense-making”.Phenomenology and Cognitive Science6: 485-507.

DISSANAYAKE, E. (2000). “Antecedents of the temporal arts in early mother-infant interaction”. En N. L. Wallin, B.Merker y S. Brown (Eds.).The Origins of Music. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

ESPAÑOL, S. (2014). La forma repetición variación. Una estrategia para la reciprocidad. En S. Español (comp.)Psicologíade la música y del desarrollo. Una exploración interdisciplinaria sobre la musicalidad humana(pp. 157-192). BuenosAires: Paidós.

ESPAÑOL, S. y PÉREZ, D. “Los juegos, los contrastes, las artes”.Boletín de Estética, 33, 2015, pp- 5-40. ISSN 2408-4417

FREEDBERG, D. and GALLESE, V. (2007) “Motion, emotion and empathy in esthetic experience” TRENDS in cognitive science, Vo. 11, no. 5: 197:203

GALLAGHER, S. (2001). “The Practice of Mind: Theory, Simulation or Interaction”. En E. Thompson (Ed.).BetweenOurselves. Second-person Issues in the Study of Consciousness. Imprint Academic, pp. 83-108.

GALLAGHER, S. (2007) “Logical and phenomenological arguments against simulation theory”. In HUTTO, D. RAT-CLIFFE, M. (eds.) Folk Psychology Re-assessed. Springer, pp. 63-78.GALLESE, V.; FADIGA, L.; FOGASSI, L.; RIZZOLATTI, Giacomo (1996). "Action recognition in the premotor cortex".Brain. 119 (2): 593–609.

GALLESE, V., GOLDMAN, A. “Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading”.Trends Cogn. Sci.1998 Dec1; 2(12): 493-501. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01262-5. PMID: 21227300.

GALLESE, V. (2005) “Embodied simulation: From neurons to phenomenal experience” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences (2005) 4: 23–48.

GALLESE, V. (2010) “Mirror neurons and art” BACCI, F. MELCHER, D. (eds.) Art and the Senses. OUP, Oxford.

GALLESE, V. (2017) “Visions of the body. Embodied simulation and aesthetic experience” Aisthesis10 (1): 41:50.

GELL, A. (1998/2016) Arte y Agencia. Una teoría antropológica. SB Editorial, Buenos Aires.

GOLDMAN, A. (1993) “The Psychology of Folk Psychology”.Behavioral and Brain Sciences16 (1):15.28.

GOLDMAN, A. (2006) Simulating Minds. OUP, Oxford.

GOMILA, A. (2001) “La perspectiva de segunda persona: mecanismos mentales de la intersubjetividad”.Contrastes6:65-86.

GOMILA, A. (2009) “Musical expression and the second person perspective”. In ALVAREZ, I.; PÉREZ, F. PÉREZ, H.(eds.)Expression in the performing arts. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 66-85.

GOMILA, A. (2013) “Las emociones en el teatro: ¿por qué nos involucramos emocionalmente con una representación?”In SORIA TOMÁS, G. (ed.)La representación de las pasiones: perspectivas artísticas, filosóficas y científicas. Madrid:Dykinson, pp. 57-78.

LIPPS, T. (1924)Fundamentos de la estética. Ed. D. Jorro, Madrid.

MALLOCH, S. y TREVARTHEN, C. (2009) “Musicality: Communicating the vitality and interests of life”. En S. MA-LLOCH y C. TREVARTHEN, C. (Eds).Communicative musicality: Exploring the basis of human companionship. Ox-ford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1-11.

MARTÍNEZ, I.C., ESPAÑOL, S.A. PÉREZ, D.I. “The Interactive Origin and the Aesthetic Modelling of Image-Schemasand Primary Metaphors” Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science2018 Dec; 52(4): 646-671.

MATÍNEZ, I.C. (2021) Dossier. La segunda persona y la música.El oído pensante. Vol. 9 Núm. 2 (2021): Septiembre 2021- Febrero 2022: 9-158.

PÉREZ, D. GOMILA, A. (2021).The second person: Social cognition in human interactio. London: Routledge.

PÉREZ, D. (2018a) “Filosofia, Ciencias Cognitivas y Sentido Común: el caso de la segunda persona de la atribuciónmental”,Revista de Filosofia Moderna e Contemporanea, Brasilia, v.6, n.1, p. 49-72 49 ISSN: 2317-9570.

PÉREZ, D. (2018b) “A expressão das emoções e a segunda pessoa (ou quanto podemos saber da mente do outro atravésde sua expressão)”, Debates contemporaneos em filosofia da mente. Leal Toledo, G. Gouvea, R y Alves, M. (eds.) Editorial FiloCzar, San Pablo, Brasil, 2018, pp. 19-94.

PÉREZ, D. (2014) "Conceptos de primera persona" en SMITH, P. J.; SILVA FILHO, W. J.; SANTOS, P. (orgs.), Crença, verdade, racionalidade: ensaios de filosofia analítica, Salvador: EDUFBA, pp. 15-36 .

PÉREZ, D. (2013). Sentir, desear, creer. Una aproximación filosófica a los conceptos psicológicos. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.

PÉREZ, D. (2011) "Phenomenal concepts, color experience, and Mary’s puzzle", Teorema. XXX/3 pp. 113-133. ISSN0210- 1602.

REDDY, V. (2008). How infants know mind. London: Harvard University Press.

RIZZOLATTI, G.; FADIGA, L.; GALLESE, V.; FOGASSI, L. (1996). "Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions". Cognitive Brain Research. 3 (2): 131–141.

SCOTTO, C. (2002) “Interacción y atribución mental: la perspectiva de la segunda persona”. Análisis Filosófico 22(2): 135-151.

STERN, D. (2010). Forms of vitality. Exploring dynamic experience in psychology, the arts, psychotherapy and development. New York: Oxford University Press.

WALTON, K. (2015)In Other Shoes. Music, Metaphor, Empathy, Existence. OUP.

Published

2021-12-08

How to Cite

Understanding and Involvement with Art from the Second-Person Perspective. Journal of Modern and Contemporary Philosophy, [S. l.], v. 9, n. 1, p. 145–163, 2021. DOI: 10.26512/rfmc.v9i1.41039. Disponível em: https://periodicostestes.bce.unb.br/index.php/fmc/article/view/41039. Acesso em: 22 feb. 2025.