EL COSMOS Y EL SENTIDO POLÍTICO DE LA CIENCIA MODERNA EN CRISIS
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article begin from the political and theological-political meaning that the study of the cosmos had in modern science, to then point out the crisis that it will be generated on the meaning of knowledge from the “Copenhagen interpretation” on reality, thus weighing some of its possible political implications today.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors maintain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, the work being simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes as well as increase the impact and the citation of the published work.
How to Cite
References
AGAMBEN, G. Qué es lo contemporáneo. In Desnudez. Buenos Aires: Adriana Hidalgo, 2014.
ARENDT, H. Entre el pasado y el futuro. Ocho ejercicios sobre la reflexión política. Barcelona: Península, 1996.
ARENDT, H. Religión y política. In Ensayos de comprensión 1930-1954. Madrid: Caparrós, 2005.
ARISTÓTELES. Metafísica. Madrid: Gredos, 1987.
BERESÑAK, F. El imperio científico. Investigaciones político-espaciales. Buenos Aires: Miño y Dávila editores, 2017.
BLUMENBERG, H. El mito y el concepto de realidad. Barcelona: Herder, 2004.
COPÉRNICO, N. Sobre las revoluciones (de los orbes celestes). Madrid: Tecnos, 2001.
FLEISNER, P. Cosmoestética: imaginación, aesthesis y mitopoiéticas en tiempos de catástrofes. [min. 2:30] Colóquio Cosmopolítica II: Tiempos de cosmopolíticas, tiempos de necropolíticas. DASQUESTÕES. [Online] 18 de nov. de 2020. Disponible en: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qaQRGTP7EAk&list=PLhpD3izdSen6hPNeVES6vsK4Kl1w4AzBF&index=7
GALILEI, G. Diálogo sobre los dos máximos sistemas del mundo ptolemaico y copernicano. Madrid: Alianza, 2011.
HALLEY, E. A esta obra físico-matemática del muy ilustre varón Isaac Newton, honra insigne de nuestro siglo y de nuestro pueblo. In: Newton, I. Principios matemáticos de la Filosofía Natural. Madrid: Alianza, 2011.
HEIDEGGER, M. El final de la filosofía y la tarea del pensar In Tiempo y ser. Madrid: Tecnos, 2006.
JAMMER, M. The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics. Nueva York: McGraw-Hill, 1966.
KUMAR, M. Quántum: Einstein, Bohr y el gran debate sobre la naturaleza de la realidad. Buenos Aires: Kairos, 2007.
NEWTON, I. Principios matemáticos de la Filosofía Natural. Madrid: Alianza, 2011.
PRÓSPERI, G. O. El lado oscuro de la luna. La esquizofrenia y el Afuera imaginal del sujeto. In. DasQuestões, Vol.8, n.2, abril de 2021. p. 75-83.