The development of marked pronouns in Portuguese: the relation with hierarchical scales

Authors

  • Aline Jéssica Pires Universidade Estadual de Campinas

Keywords:

differential object marking, personal pronoun, preposition a,, diachronic Portuguese

Abstract

This squib investigates the adequacy of hierarchical scales to describe the development of Differential Object Marking in Portuguese. Cases in which the direct object is marked by a preposition are classified as instances of Differential Object Marking. Many studies claim that the development of the phenomenon can be described according to the hierarchical scales of animacy and definiteness. Such scales predict that the first stage of the development of the phenomenon will be first- and second-person pronouns and third-person pronouns would be marked only at a later stage. However, both Old Catalan and Old Romanian exhibit cases of violation of the scales in that third-person pronoun cases are more frequent than the occurrences of first- and second-person pronouns. The same violation is found in diachronic Portuguese. Therefore, the present squib proposes that marking first- and second-person pronouns would be redundant at the first stage of the development of the phenomenon and that the third-person pronoun is marked due to the presence of the [-PERSON] feature.

References

AISSEN, J. Differential Object Marking: Iconicity vs. Economy. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, v. 21, n. 3, p. 435-483, ago. 2003.

CLUL (ed.). P.S. Post Scriptum. Arquivo Digital de Escrita Quotidiana em Portugal e Espanha na Época Moderna. 2014. Disponível em: http://ps.clul.ul.pt.

CYRINO, S. M. L. Animacidade na sintaxe: uma abordagem formal. Revista da Anpoll, Florianópolis, v. 1, n. 46, p. 222-238, maio/ago. 2018.

GALVES, C.; ANDRADE, A.; FARIA, P. Corpus Histórico do Português Tycho Brahe. 2017. Disponível em: http://www.tycho.iel.unicamp.br/~tycho/corpus/texts/psd.zip.

IRIMIA, M. A.; PINEDA, A. Differential object marking and Scales: Insights from diachrony. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America, v. 4, n. 1, p. 1-15, 2019.

LEONETTI, M. Clitics do not encode specificity. In: Proceedings of the workshop “Definiteness, specificity and animacy in Ibero-Romance languages”. Universität Konstanz, Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft, 2007. p. 111-139.

LEONETTI, M. Specificity in clitic doubling and in differential object marking. Probus, v. 20, n. 1, p. 33-66, 2008.

PIRES, A. J. A marcação diferencial de objeto no português: um estudo sintático-diacrônico. 2017. Dissertação (Mestrado) ”“ Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Estudos da Linguagem, Campinas, SP, 2017.

PIRES, A. J. “Deus julga-nos a nós”: um caso de redobro de clítico no português? In: PILATI, E.; MOREIRA, B. (org.). Estudos formalistas nas línguas naturais ”“ volume 2. Campinas: Pontes Editores, 2018. p. 99-119.

VON HEUSINGER, K.; KAISER, G. The evolution of differential object marking in Spanish. In: Proceedings of the workshop “Specificity and the evolution/emergence of nominal determination systems in Romance”. Universität Konstanz, Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft, 2005, p. 33-69.

VON HEUSINGER, K.; GÁSPÁR, E. O. Triggering and blocking effects in the diachronic development of DOM in Romanian. Probus, v. 20, n. 1, p. 67-110, 2008.

Published

31.05.2020