False Pleasures, Good Friendships

Authors

  • Marco Zingano Universidade de São Paulo - São Paulo - SP - Brasil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_34_12

Keywords:

Friendship, Virtue, Utility, Pleasure, Ethics

Abstract

In this paper, we aim to explore Aristotle’s analysis of friendship by examining its three objects of friendship - virtue, utility, and pleasure. We will also explain why these three objects of friendship pose a challenge to defining friendship as a common and singular entity, namely, as a reciprocal and conscious benevolence that has practical effects. It is shown that the objects of friendship are part and parcel of the kind of personal relationship friendship is, making it impossible to provide a common definition.

References

CURZER, H. (2012). Aristotle and the Virtues Oxford, Oxford University Press.

FORTENBAUGH, W. (1975). Aristotle’s Analysis of Friendship: Function and Analogy, Resemblance, and Focal Meaning. Phronesis 20, n. 1, p. 51-62.

FREDE, D. (1985). Rumpelstilskin’s Pleasures: True and False Pleasure in Plato’s Philebus. Phronesis 30, n. 2, p. 151-180.

IRWIN, T. (1985). Aristotle’s Conception of Morality. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 1, p. 115-143.

IRWIN, T. (2007). The Development of Ethics - vol. I: From Socrates to the Reformation Oxford, Oxford University Press .

JOACHIM, H. (1951). Aristotle - The Nicomachean Ethics Oxford, Oxford University Press .

MUNIZ, F. (2014). Propositional Pleasures in Plato’s Philebus. Journal of Ancient Philosophy 8, n. 1, p. 49-75.

PENNER, T.; ROWE, C. (2005). Plato’s Lysis Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

ROTH, M. (1995). Did Plato nod? Some conjectures on Egoism and Friendship in the Lysis. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 77, n. 1, p. 1-20.

ZINGANO, M. (2015). Friendship and the Conceptual Unity in the Eudemian Ethics and the Nicomachean Ethics. Apeiron 48, n.2, p. 195-219.

Published

2024-08-06

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite