Justicia, Responsabilidad, Transparencia y Ética (FATE) en sistemas de recomendación en la educación:
un análisis de coocurrencia de palabras
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26512/rici.v19.n2.2026.60555Palabras clave:
Sistema de recomendación, Ética, Análisis de co-palabras, Tecnología educativa, BibliometriaResumen
El objetivo principal de este artículo es examinar la producción científica relacionada con los conceptos de justicia, responsabilidad, transparencia y ética (FATE) en artículos sobre sistemas de recomendación en educación, utilizando indicadores bibliométricos y análisis de coocurrencia de palabras clave. La investigación identifica un aumento exponencial en la producción académica desde 2020, destacando palabras clave como Fairness y Explainable AI, consolidadas como pilares en las discusiones éticas del área. El análisis se basó en 160 registros de las bases Scopus y Web of Science, utilizando RStudio y Bibliometrix para el mapeo de datos. Los resultados destacan la interdisciplinariedad del área y la emergencia de temas como Responsible AI y Algorithmic Fairness, aún en etapas iniciales de desarrollo. La red de coocurrencia y el diagrama temático revelaron conexiones importantes entre los principios FATE y sus aplicaciones prácticas, señalando vacíos teóricos y oportunidades para futuras investigaciones. A pesar de las limitaciones relacionadas con el alcance de la búsqueda, el estudio ofrece una visión amplia de las implicaciones éticas de los sistemas de recomendación educativos, enfatizando la necesidad de sistemas más justos, transparentes y responsables. Las conclusiones refuerzan la relevancia de FATE como agenda prioritaria para el diseño de tecnologías educativas éticas e inclusivas.
Descargas
Citas
ABDOLLAHPOURI, H. et al. The connection between popularity bias, calibration, and fairness in recommendation. In: ACM RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS CONFERENCE, 14., 2020. Proceedings… Rio de Janeiro: ACM, 2020. p. 726-731. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1145/3383313.3418487. Acesso em: 23 out. 2024.
ARIA, M.; CUCCURULLO, C. Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, v. 11, p. 959-975, 2017. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007. Acesso em: 23 out. 2024.
BAROCAS, S.; HARDT, M.; NARAYANAN, A. Fairness and machine learning: limitations and opportunities. [S.l: S.n], 2019. Disponível em: fairmlbook.org. Acesso em: 23 out. 2024.
BURR, C.; CRISTIANINI, N.; LADYMAN, J. An analysis of the interaction between intelligent software agents and human users. Minds and Machines, v. 28, n. 4, p. 735–774, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9479-0. Acesso em: 23 out. 2024.
CARDONA, M.A.; RODRÍGUEZ, R.J.; ISHMAEL, K. Artificial intelligence and the future of teaching and learning: insights and recommendations. Washington: Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology, 2023. Disponível em: https://www2.ed.gov/documents/ai-report/ai-report.pdf. Acesso em: 23 out. 2024.
CALLON, M. et al. From translations to problematic networks: an introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, v. 22, n. 2, p. 191-235, 1983. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/053901883022002003. Acesso em: 23 out. 2024.
DELDJOO, Y. et al. Fairness in recommender systems: research landscape and future directions. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, v. 34, p. 59-108, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-023-09364-z. Acesso em: 23 out. 2024.
DESCHÊNES, M. Recommender systems to support learners’ agency in a learning context: a systematic review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2020, v.17, 50, p. 1–23, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00219-w. Acesso em: 23 out. 2024.
EKSTRAND, M.D. et al. Fairness in information access systems. Foundation and Trends in Information Retrieval, v. 16, n.1/2, p. 1-177, 2022. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1561/1500000079. Acesso em: 23 out. 2024.
HE, Q. Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis. Library Trends, v. 48, n. 1, p. 133-159, 1999. Disponível em: http://bit.ly/48aYW5K. Acesso em: 23 out. 2024.
HUANG, C. et al. An overview of artificial intelligence ethics. IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, v. 4, n. 4, p. 799-819, 2023. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1109/TAI.2022.3194503. Acesso em: 23 out. 2024.
INUWA-DUTSE, I. FATE in AI: towards algorithmic inclusivity and accessibility. In: ACM CONFERENCE ON EQUITY AND ACCESS IN ALGORITHMS, MECHANISMS, AND OPTIMIZATION, 3., 2023. Proceedings… Boston: ACM, 2023. p. 1-14. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1145/3617694.3623233. Acesso em: 23 out. 2024.
JOBIN, A.; IENCA, M.; VAYENA, E. The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, v. 1, n. 9, p. 389-399, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2. Acesso em: 23 out. 2024.
KHAN, A.; YADAV, A.; RAHI, A.C. A brief survey on recommendation system. International Journal of Research in Engineering, Science and Management, v. 3, n. 6, 2020. Disponível em: https://www.ijresm.com/volume-3-issue-6-june-2020. Acesso em: 23 out. 2024.
KONSTAN, J.A.; RIEDL, J. Deconstructing recommender systems. IEEE Spectrum, 24 set. 2012. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/3MgAVSd. Acesso em: 23 out. 2024.
LAMPROPOULOS, G. Recommender systems in education: a literature review and bibliometric analysis. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, v. 3, n. 2, p. 829-850, 2023. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2023.02.011. Acesso em: 23 out. 2024.
LINDBERG, S.I. Mapping accountability: core concept and subtypes. International Review of Administrative Sciences, v. 79, n. 2, p. 202–226. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852313477761. Acesso em: 23 out. 2024.
MANOUSELIS, N.; VUORIKARI, R.; VAN ASSCHE, F. Collaborative recommendation of e‐learning resources: an experimental investigation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, v. 26, n. 4, p. 227-242, 2010. Disponível em: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00362.x. Acesso em: 23 out. 2024.
MAPHOSA, V.; MAPHOSA, M. Fifteen years of recommender systems research in higher education: current trends and future direction. Applied Artificial Intelligence, v. 37, n. 1, 2175106, 2023. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2023.2175106. Acesso em: 23 out. 2024.
MEMARIAN, B; DOLECK, T. Fairness, accountability, transparency, and ethics (FATE) in artificial intelligence (AI) and higher education: a systematic review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, v. 5, 100152, 2023. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100152. Acesso em: 23 out. 2024.
MILANO, S.; TADDEO, M.; FLORIDI, L. Recommender systems and their ethical challenges. AI & Society, v. 35, p. 957-967, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00950-y. Acesso em: 23 out. 2024.
MILLER, G.A. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacityfor processing information. Psychological Review, v. 63, n. 2, p. 81-97, 1956. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158. Acesso em: 23 out. 2024.
MULLIGAN, D.K. et al. This thing called fairness: Disciplinary confusion realizing a value in technology. In: ACM ON HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 3., 2019. Proceedings… New York: ACM, 2019. p. 1-36. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1145/3359221. Acesso em: 23 out. 2024.
NOVELLI, C.; TADDEO, M.; FLORIDI, L. Accountability in artificial intelligence: what it is and how it works. AI & Society, v.39, p. 1-12, 2023. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01635-y. Acesso em: 23 out. 2024.
OECD. Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques. OECD.AI: policy observatory: OECD AI principles overview. 2024. Disponível em: https://oecd.ai/en/ai-principles. Acesso em: 23 out. 2024.
OLSEN, J.P. Ambiguity and the politics of accountability. In: OLSEN, J.P. (Ed.). Democratic accountability, political order, and change: exploring accountability processes in an era of European transformation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. p. 74-96. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198800606.003.0004. Acesso em: 23 out. 2024.
PAZZANI, M.J.; BILLSUS, D. Content-based recommendation systems. In: BRUSILOVSKY, P.; KOBSA, A.; NEJDL, W. (Ed.). The adaptive web: methods and strategies of web personalization. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2007. p. 325-341. Disponível em: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/1768197.1768209. Acesso em: 23 out. 2024.
POPENICI, S.A.D.; KERR, S. Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, v. 12, n. 22, p. 1-13, 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-017-0062-8. Acesso em: 23 out. 2024.
RICCI, F.; ROKACH, L.; SHAPIRA, B. Recommender systems: introduction and challenges. In: RICCI, F.; ROKACH, L.; SHAPIRA, B. (Ed.). Recommender systems handbook. 2.ed. New York: Springer, 2015. p. 1-34. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7637-6_1. Acesso 23 out. 2024.
RIVERA, A.C.; TAPIA-LEÓN, M.; LUJAN-MORA, S. Recommendation systems in education: a systematic mapping study. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & SYSTEMS, 1., 2018. Proceedings… Cham: Springer, 2018. p. 937-947. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73450-7_89. Acesso em: 23 out. 2024.
SILVA, F.L. et al. A systematic literature review on educational recommender systems for teaching and learning: research trends, limitations and opportunities. Education and Information Technologies, v. 28, p. 2289-2328, 2023. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11341-9. Acesso em: 23 out. 2024.
WANG, R.; HARPER, F.M.; ZHU, H. Factors influencing perceived fairness in algorithmic decision-making: algorithm outcomes, development procedures, and individual differences. In: CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 1., 2020. Proceedings…Honolulu, ACM, 2020. p. 1-14. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376813. Acesso em: 23 out. 2024.
THEODOROU, A.; DIGNUM, V. Towards ethical and socio-legal governance in AI. Natural Machine Intelligence, v. 2, p. 10-12, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0136-y. Acesso em: 23 out. 2024.
VENKATRAMAN, S. A proposed business intelligent framework for recommender systems. Informatics, n. 4, 40. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics4040040. Acesso em: 23 out. 2024.
ZAWACKI-RICHTER, O.; LATCHEM, C. Exploring four decades of research in Computers & Education. Computers and Education, New, v. 122, p. 136-152, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.001. Acesso em: 23 out. 2024.
ZIPF, George Kingsley. Human behavior and the principle of least effort: an introduction to human ecology. Cambridge, Addison-Wesley, 1949. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/488PeRn. Acesso em: 23 out. 2024.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Rafael Antunes dos Santos, Priscila Ferreira Beni, Eliseo Berni Reategui, Dante Augusto Couto Barone
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Aviso de derechos de autor/a
Los autores que publican en esta revista concuerdan con los siguientes términos:
Los autores mantiene los derechos autorales y conceden a la revista el derecho de primera publicación, con el trabajo simultáneamente licenciado bajo Creative Commons - Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0), permitiendo el reparto del trabajo con reconocimiento de la autoría y la publicación inicial en esta revista. Los autores tienen autorización para asumir contratos adicionales separadamente, para la distribución no-exclusiva de la versión del trabajo publicada en esta revista (p.ej.: distribuir en el repositório institucional o publicar como capítulo de libro), con reconocimiento de la autoría y la publicación inicial en esta revista. Los autores tienen permiso y son apoyados a distribuir su trabajo online (p.ej.: en repositórios institucionales o en su página personal) a cualquier punto antes o durante el proceso editorial, ya que eso puede generar efectos productivos, así como aumentar el impacto y la citación del trabajo publicado.
