Artificial Intelligence in Ukrainian Law Enforcement
Operational Effectivness and Regulatory Challenges in Countering Hybrid Criminal Offences Against Critical Infrastructure
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26512/lstr.v18i2.55813Keywords:
Artificial intelligence. Law enforcement. Critical infrastructure protection. Hybrid threats. Predictive analytics. Machine learning. Regulatory framework. Cyber-physical security. Criminal offences. Ukraine.Abstract
[Purpose] The study examined how Ukrainian law enforcement agencies used artificial intelligence to prevent crimes against critical infrastructure in the context of the escalation of hybrid threats in 2022–2025. The work combined an analysis of the practical use of technologies, threat typologies, and current legislation, which made it possible to assess the effectiveness of AI during real military operations.
[Methodology] A mixed approach was used: surveys, interviews, and case studies of facilities with implemented AI. Quantitative data was processed using statistical methods, qualitative data was processed using thematic analysis. The sample was limited to institutions that already use AI, which allowed us to focus on the real effectiveness of the technologies.
[Findings] AI systems reduced the number of security incidents by approximately 40% and increased operational efficiency by 30%. The technologies successfully detected sabotage attempts, drone reconnaissance, cyber intrusions, and anomalies in SCADA/ICS. At the same time, the study identified gaps in legal regulation, from the lack of transparency requirements for algorithms to unclear rules on the admissibility of data generated by AI.
[Originality/value] The work combines empirical data, legal analysis, and a wartime context. It is one of the first in-depth studies of the use of AI in law enforcement in a hybrid conflict.
[Practical implications] The results confirm that AI can become a key element in the protection of Ukrainian infrastructure. Specific regulation, standards of evidence, cross-sectoral coordination, and staff training are needed. The study’s recommendations can help authorities and infrastructure operators increase resilience and ensure the lawful and effective implementation of AI.
Downloads
References
Baltrūnienė, J. (2023). Place of artificial intelligence in the detection and investigation of crime: The present state and future perspectives. Problemy Współczesnej Kryminalistyki, 26, 43-58. https://doi.org/10.52097/pwk.5431
Cherniavskyi, S., Tychyna, D., & Pertsev, R. (2022). International experience in forensic support for crime investigation. Ûridičnij Časopis Nacìonalʹnoï Akademìï Vnutrìšnìh Sprav, 12(3), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.56215/04221203.09
CISA. (2024). Critical infrastructure sectors. Retrieved from https://www.cisa.gov/topics/critical-infrastructure-security-and-resilience/critical-infrastructure-sectors
Consulich, F. (2023). Criminal law and artificial intelligence: Perspective from Italian and European experience. European Criminal Law Review, 13(3), 270-307. https://doi.org/10.5771/2193-5505-2023-3-270
Daniel, N. S. A., & Victor, N. S. S. (2024). Emerging trends in cybersecurity for critical infrastructure protection: A comprehensive review. Computer Science & IT Research Journal, 5(3), 576-593. https://doi.org/10.51594/csitrj.v5i3.872
Digital Security Lab Ukraine. (2024). Running Up That Hill: Artificial Intelligence in Ukrainian Public Sector Analytical study. Retrieved from https://dslua.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/AI-in-Ukrainian-Public-Sector_Avdieieva.pdf
Houbrechts, M. (2024). Using AI for data analysis: The ultimate guide. Luzmo. Retrieved from https://www.luzmo.com/blog/ai-data-analysis
Hubanova, T., Shchokin, R., Hubanov, O., Antonov, V., Slobodianiuk, P., & Podolyaka, S. (2021). Information technologies in improving crime prevention mechanisms in the border regions of southern Ukraine. Journal of Information Technology Management, 13, 75-90. https://doi.org/10.22059/JITM.2021.80738
Karchevskyi, M. V., & Radutniy, O. E. (2023). Artificial intelligence in Ukrainian traditional categories of criminal law. Herald of the Association of Criminal Law of Ukraine, 1(19), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.21564/2311-9640.2023.19.281123
Kulal, A., Rahiman, H. U., Suvarna, H., Abhishek, N., & Dinesh, S. (2024). Enhancing public service delivery efficiency: Exploring the impact of AI. Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity, 10(3), 100329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100329
Laplante, P., & Amaba, B. (2021). Artificial intelligence in critical infrastructure systems. Computer, 54(10), 14-24. https://doi.org/10.1109/mc.2021.3055892
Lytvyn, N., Andrushchenko, H., Zozulya, Y. V., Nikanorova, O. V., & Rusal, L. M. (2022). Enforcement of court decisions as a social guarantee of protection of citizens rights and freedoms. Prawo i Wiez, 39, 80-102. https://doi.org/10.36128/priw.vi39.351
Madaoui, N. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence on legal systems: Challenges and opportunities. Problems of Legality, 1(164), 285-303. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.164.289266
MiniTAB. (2024). Data analysis, statistical & process improvement tools. Retrieved from https://www.minitab.com/en-us/
Molodoria, A. (2024). Using AI data analytics & forecasting to build custom business intelligence software. Retrieved from https://mobidev.biz/blog/build-ai-data-analytics-forecasting-business-intelligence-software
Nedilko, Y. (2023). The practical significance of the forensic characteristics of criminal offenses under section XVI of the criminal code of Ukraine. Criminalistics and Forensics, 68, 267-274. https://doi.org/10.33994/kndise.2023.68.26
OSF. (2024). The role of state and local law enforcement in critical infrastructure protection. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MWNP9
Pettoello-Mantovani, C. (2024). Cybercrimes: An emerging category of offenses within the frame of the International Criminal Court jurisdiction. International Journal of Law and Politics Studies, 6(2), 06-11. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijlps.2024.6.2.2
Raval, K. J., Jadav, N. K., Rathod, T., Tanwar, S., Vimal, V., & Yamsani, N. (2024). A survey on safeguarding critical infrastructures: Attacks, AI security, and future directions. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 44, 100647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcip.2023.100647
Santoso, F., & Finn, A. (2023). An in-depth examination of artificial intelligence-enhanced cybersecurity in robotics, autonomous systems, and critical infrastructures. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 17(3), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsc.2023.3331083
Sivek, S. C. (2024). The Data Analyst’s Guide to AI. Retrieved from https://www.pecan.ai/blog/ai-for-data-analysts-guide/
Strmečki, S., & Pejaković-Đipić, S. (2023). Data protection, privacy, and security in the context of artificial intelligence and conventional methods for law enforcement. EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series, 7, 571-589. https://doi.org/10.25234/eclic/27462
Vitanov, P. (2021). Report on artificial intelligence in criminal law and its use by the police and judicial authorities in criminal matters. European Parliament. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2021-0232_EN.html
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Law, State and Telecommunications Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By submitting this paper to the Law, State and Telecommunications Review,
I hereby declare that I agree to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
